QUESTION 22: Do you support

Support

Representation ID: 2

Received: 07/06/2021

Respondent: Mr Martin Scaiff

This site seems a logical connection between the spur road end of the village and the bell road end. A small development with significant environmental mitigation measures would be a welcome addition to the village.

Support

Representation ID: 37

Received: 08/06/2021

Respondent: Mrs julia Robathan

Would tie two ends together.would benefit from further walkways to school

Object

Representation ID: 578

Received: 23/07/2021

Respondent: Ms Catherine Hayes

NCC need to develop a climate action plan before any new builds take place . We need more green spaces, a village meadow and ways of conserving what is here rather than increase stress on the failing infrastructure and struggling wild life.

Support

Representation ID: 858

Received: 29/07/2021

Respondent: Barnham Broom Parish Council

Good visibility and links to the rest of the village.

Support

Representation ID: 1100

Received: 01/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs Christine Plaskett

This seems like another good option, already on the main road and would not affect any other residents.

Comment

Representation ID: 1262

Received: 01/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Bob Harvey

In principal I support this site for up to 9 dwellings on the basis that it continues the existing building line, infills and does not impact directly upon a large number of other residents. However, the site could lend itself to a larger number of dwellings, which would be an issue. Also access to the proposed site, if approved should not be via an access left vacant between two existing properties, which would be detrimental. The retention of the existing mature trees should be guaranteed. Entry and exit to site should be contained within the site.

Comment

Representation ID: 1878

Received: 22/07/2021

Respondent: South Norfolk Council

The Environmental Protection Team are not aware of any significant land quality issue with this site or adjacent land. However, having regard to the size of the site and sensitivity of the proposed development it is considered that a Phase One Land Contamination Report (Desk Study) should be required as part of any planning application.

Due to the size of this development and its proximity to existing dwellings, an application to develop this site is likely to attract the recommendation that standard planning condition AM05 Construction Management Plan be attached to any approval. It may be worth highlighting to applicants that to avoid any delay in discharging this condition, they may wish to include a Construction Management Plan with their application. If the submitted Construction Management Plan is adequate, the an alternative condition could be attached to any approval requiring its implementation.

Comment

Representation ID: 1927

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Water Management Alliance

See attachment for full response.
SN2110 – Land south of Norwich Road, Barnham Broom
Outside the IDD boundary, within the Norfolk Rivers IDB watershed catchment.
Minor development – no further comments

Comment

Representation ID: 2006

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Environment Agency (Eastern Region)

Foul Water Capacity
For sites SN0552, SN0018SL, SN2110, SN4051, SN0055, SN0174 andSN0196 available information indicates may be around 150 houses planned here in total for preferred and shortlisted sites. Barnham Broom has some capacity for foul water flows (for approximately 50 houses) but not for all the houses planned in these developments. Discussions will need to be held with Anglian Water (AWS), and development must be phased in line with WRC treatment capacity being made available.

Comment

Representation ID: 2145

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA

SN2110
See attachment for full comments
Few or no constraints.
Standard information required at a planning stage. "1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: Yes
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: Minor flooding
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: 0.00 - 0.60cm.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: Minor flooding
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: 0.00 - 0.60cm.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: Minor flooding
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: 0.00 - 0.60cm.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): Yes - Internal Flooding
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: Source Protection Zone 3
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of DIAMICTON. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."

Assessment: Green

Comment

Representation ID: 2195

Received: 28/09/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Senior Ecologist

Rating: Green no major ecological constraints identified from desk-top search. Surveys, and biodiversity enhancement in accordance with policy required.
The site is part of an agricultural field, bounded along the northern edge by a ditch, and line of standard trees. To the north is an area of deciduous woodland (priority habitat) (see MAGIC). The site is in a SSSI Impact Risk Zone although 'residential' development would not trigger consultation with Natural England. The site is in an amber zone for great crested newts (identified by Natural England as part of DLL licensing). Consideration should be given to creating priority habitats (e.g., hedgerows). Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain. Opportunities to enhance and extend priority habitats are encouraged.