QUESTION 25: Do you think

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 4

Received: 07/06/2021

Respondent: Mr Martin Scaiff

Representation Summary:

Sn055 is not an appropriate site for development. Required footways would narrow the existing road which is already prone to speeding by traffic making it more dangerous, particularly as no footways currently exist on either side. Traffic calming measures may mitigate this. Any proposed development should be more environmentally aware than the recent bank side development where there appear to be no obvious environmental measures (increased vegetation, renewable energy etc). A further development of this sort would damage the health and sustainability of the village.

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 40

Received: 08/06/2021

Respondent: Mrs julia Robathan

Representation Summary:

Yes, shortlisted sites SN0196 and SN0174should be rejected. Bankside way hasnot been effectively built for through traffic, the road end left was an afterthought and a through riad would make the propsed sites disconnected from the village. The view to the valley would be spoiled and the area floods. Bankside way as entry is not fit for purpose. As a resident it would remove the cul de sac and area where the children congregate and play (at the moment safely).

Support

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 581

Received: 23/07/2021

Respondent: Ms Catherine Hayes

Representation Summary:

NCC need to develop a climate action plan before any new builds take place . We need more green spaces, a village meadow and ways of conserving what is here rather than increase stress on the failing infrastructure and struggling wild life.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1102

Received: 01/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs Christine Plaskett

Representation Summary:

Specifically SN0174 and SN0196. This is very intrusive in the Yare Valley, surely this is also a flood risk. As a resident of Bankside Way, our children play on the green in front of our houses every day. This is good for their social interaction and wellbeing and using Bankside as a through road will stop this from being a safe place to play, completely changing the community we have built up here.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1279

Received: 01/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Bob Harvey

Representation Summary:

Site SN4051 appears to be heavily argued in favour by the planners on the basis of resulting road junction change mitigation. This junction needs alteration, however it has never before received such attention from planners based in Long Stratton and has not previously received the relevant support of NCC Highways? If this site is approved it will be unpopular, when there are other sites within the village boundary which offer the numbers and more importantly the existing infrastructure to support 50+ dwellings.