QUESTION 28: Do you think

Object

Representation ID: 410

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Steven and Glynis Watling

Number of people: 2

We would like to oppose this rejection. Our reasons are as follows:-

1. You have set a precedent with the land to the east of Stocks Hill site No SN4053.

2. Our site, site No SN0002SL, does not infringe on any other neighboring properties as it is completely surrounded by mature trees and hedging.

3. You have mentioned that if you gave approval, this might give other properties along Stocks hill president to build in their gardens. This would not be posible as all the other gardens in Stocks Hill are not big enough to build. Ours is by far the biggest plot.

4. The reason for us wanting to build is that we love living in Bawburgh but it is becoming too much for us to keep the garden up. We belive that what we have achieved a property of great character and a big asset to the village in the 16 years we have been here. The new property would be of the same spec as The Brambles but with more eco friendly efficiency paying particular attention to green issues.

We hope these reasons are enough for you to re-consider your decision to reject the proposal.

Comment

Representation ID: 1887

Received: 22/07/2021

Respondent: South Norfolk Council

SN4071: Land to the east of Harts Lane and South of Long Lane
The Environmental Protection Team are not aware of any significant land quality issue with this site or adjacent land. However, having regard to the size of the site and sensitivity of the proposed development it is considered that a Phase One Land Contamination Report (Desk Study) should be required as part of any planning application.

Due to the size of this development and its proximity to existing dwellings, an application to develop this site is likely to attract the recommendation that standard planning condition AM05 Construction Management Plan be attached to any approval. It may be worth highlighting to applicants that to avoid any delay in discharging this condition, they may wish to include a Construction Management Plan with their application. If the submitted Construction Management Plan is adequate, the an alternative condition could be attached to any approval requiring its implementation.

Comment

Representation ID: 1888

Received: 22/07/2021

Respondent: South Norfolk Council

SN3032: Land to the west of Harts Lane
The Environmental Protection Team are not aware of any significant land quality issue with this site or adjacent land. However, having regard to the size of the site and sensitivity of the proposed development it is considered that a Phase One Land Contamination Report (Desk Study) should be required as part of any planning application.

Due to the size of this development and its proximity to existing dwellings, an application to develop this site is likely to attract the recommendation that standard planning condition AM05 Construction Management Plan be attached to any approval. It may be worth highlighting to applicants that to avoid any delay in discharging this condition, they may wish to include a Construction Management Plan with their application. If the submitted Construction Management Plan is adequate, the an alternative condition could be attached to any approval requiring its implementation.

Comment

Representation ID: 1889

Received: 22/07/2021

Respondent: South Norfolk Council

SN0015: Land at New Road
The Environmental Protection Team are not aware of any significant land quality issue with this site or adjacent land. However, having regard to the size of the site and sensitivity of the proposed development it is considered that a Phase One Land Contamination Report (Desk Study) should be required as part of any planning application.

The site in question is close to land used for pig and poultry rearing that has been the subject of nuisance complaints in the past and which has a potential to have a negative impact on the amenity of the residents of any dwellings constructed on the site due to noise, odour and flies. In addition, placing sensitive receptors close to this agricultural activity could impact its future viability. It is therefore considered that this will need to be addressed as part of any application for dwellings on this site.

Due to the size of this development and its proximity to existing dwellings, an application to develop this site is likely to attract the recommendation that standard planning condition AM05 Construction Management Plan be attached to any approval. It may be worth highlighting to applicants that to avoid any delay in discharging this condition, they may wish to include a Construction Management Plan with their application. If the submitted Construction Management Plan is adequate, the an alternative condition could be attached to any approval requiring its implementation.

Comment

Representation ID: 1890

Received: 22/07/2021

Respondent: South Norfolk Council

SN0002SL: Land to the east of the Brambles, Stocks Hill
The Environmental Protection Team are not aware of any significant land quality issue with this site or adjacent land. However, having regard to the size of the site and sensitivity of the proposed development it is considered that a Phase One Land Contamination Report (Desk Study) should be required as part of any planning application.

Due to the size of this development and its proximity to existing dwellings, an application to develop this site is likely to attract the recommendation that standard planning condition AM05 Construction Management Plan be attached to any approval. It may be worth highlighting to applicants that to avoid any delay in discharging this condition, they may wish to include a Construction Management Plan with their application. If the submitted Construction Management Plan is adequate, the an alternative condition could be attached to any approval requiring its implementation.