6.5

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 2341

Received: 17/02/2023

Respondent: Mrs Amy Buxton

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Lack of suitable infrastructure for 35 new homes.
Danger of more fatalities as traffic increases through the rat run.
Borders up to conservation area.

Change suggested by respondent:

scrapped

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 2353

Received: 17/02/2023

Respondent: Mr Gavin Buxton

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Lack of suitable infrastructure for 35 new homes.
Danger of more fatalities as traffic increases through the rat run.
Borders up to conservation area.

Change suggested by respondent:

scrapped

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 2362

Received: 18/02/2023

Respondent: Mr Tony Kemsley

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

In our opinion, the character of Bawburgh has been irreparably destroyed by re-opening New Road following the construction of the Southern Bypass (1990s), together with the housing increases in the GNLP and the development of Longwater Retail Park and Park & Ride. These have already turned the village into a speeding “Rat Run” degrading the quality of life and vitality of the village. The current plan will add further traffic volume and create another access point on a dangerous brow of a hill.

Change suggested by respondent:

Prevent further building in Bawburgh

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 2498

Received: 27/02/2023

Respondent: Collins & Coward Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The site exceeds 1.0ha which is the upper limit as prescribed by para 69 of the NPPF. The new development of bungalows (10 units) permitted under 2018/1550 has a density of 9 units per hectare. BAW1 should be same density and comprise bungalows.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 2709

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Mr Kevin Underwood

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Development within the Norwich Southern Bypass Landscape Protection Zone (NSBLPZ), should have regard to protecting the openness of the zone and, enhancing the landscape setting of the southern bypass. Development which would significantly harm the NSBLPZ will not be permitted.

Access provided by the footpaths is limited to an area within the village but it should be noted that there are no footpaths along Stocks Hill that provide access to the Watton Road, or along New Road providing access to Bowthorpe or from the top of Hart's Lane and along Long Lane providing access to the Longwater retail area.

Change suggested by respondent:

As there is no safe pedestrian access out of the village and as the views from Stocks Hill and the openness and character of the village will be detrimentally affected the plan should be scrapped.