6.7

Object

Representation ID: 2343

Received: 17/02/2023

Respondent: Mrs Amy Buxton

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Lack of suitable infrastructure for 35 new homes.
Danger of more fatalities as traffic increases through the rat run.
Borders up to conservation area.

Object

Representation ID: 2355

Received: 17/02/2023

Respondent: Mr Gavin Buxton

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Lack of suitable infrastructure for 35 new homes.
Danger of more fatalities as traffic increases through the rat run.
Borders up to conservation area.

Object

Representation ID: 2744

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Mrs E Tolhurst

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Existing vegetation is not enough to screen the new housing. The current field view is a good asset for the village to maintain its rural character and sense of separation from Norwich, which will be lost to the new development.

Object

Representation ID: 2772

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Mr Mike Smallwood

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The proposed development contradicts the SNVC objective 3 to “protect the historic environment, Although the proposed site is not directly inside the conservation area, it is adjacent to the boundary and will affect the character of the village. Furthermore, additional traffic through the village would increase the risk of damage to listed buildings and historical features such as the narrow 18th century bridge.