6.10

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 2346

Received: 17/02/2023

Respondent: Mrs Amy Buxton

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Lack of suitable infrastructure for 35 new homes.
Danger of more fatalities as traffic increases through the rat run.
Borders up to conservation area.

Change suggested by respondent:

scrapped

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 2358

Received: 17/02/2023

Respondent: Mr Gavin Buxton

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Lack of suitable infrastructure for 35 new homes.
Danger of more fatalities as traffic increases through the rat run.
Borders up to conservation area.

Change suggested by respondent:

scrapped

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 2715

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Mr Kevin Underwood

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

There are already problems with the sewers and water supply in Bawburgh and Anglian Water has to attend issues with blockages and burst pipes each year. With all the development taking place within the catchment of the Whitlingham Water Recycling Centre (WWRC) concerns need to be raised regarding the ability of the WWRC to process the increased volumes of sewerage especially as the numbers of discharges of sewerage into the sea and waterways is already a national concern.

Change suggested by respondent:

Due to existing problems with sewerage and water supply in the village the plan should be scrapped

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 2746

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Mrs E Tolhurst

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Phasing would lengthen disruption to nearby residents and villagers, with long term building noise and added traffic. Disruption to sewers serving nearby housing.

Change suggested by respondent:

Much smaller development that does not encroach on land that contains sewers for other residents.