29.2
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 2601
Received: 02/03/2023
Respondent: Mr Andrew Cullum
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Yes
The area to the east of the village has high landscape value consisting of gentle hills with wildlife friendly hedges, scrub and trees It marks the gradual end of a natural ridge and provides good walking and excellent views in almost all directions as the footpath winds through the landscape to Claxton , along the "Beck" and back to the staithe. ECC has broken into this vista and it appears that 25 houses will almost certainly destroy this wonderful area of the village
A change to establish a policy that promotes building, instead of the landscape.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 2951
Received: 08/03/2023
Respondent: Mr Peter Armitage
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The increase in housing will spoil the village's pleasant rural character
less housing
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 3012
Received: 08/03/2023
Respondent: mr Christopher Tusting
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The village does indeed have a 'pleasant rural character' - mainly due to the quality of farmland. The Site Assessment states “agricultural soil classification unclear”. However The Natural England classification (ALC008) clearly shows the land as ‘Grade 2 - very good’. The fact that its classification was not confirmed, especially when it is clearly high quality is unacceptable. The loss of this land when agricultural production needs to be intensified is unjustifiable and contravenes Natural England policy (TIN049).
Brownfield sites or areas of poorer farmland should be used for development leaving best quality land for sustainable food production now and in the future.