29.11

Object

Representation ID: 2336

Received: 16/02/2023

Respondent: Mrs Janet Rogers

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

The additional footpath next to the Old Hall Barn would be of no real benefit and end on the road with no footpath other than that on the North side of The Street.

Object

Representation ID: 2645

Received: 03/03/2023

Respondent: Mr Nigel Kippin

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The access to the site has restricted view due to bends, trees and hill crest. The safe access and egress of potentially 50 vehicle movements a day puts the risk of accident very high. The existing entrance to Eel Catcher Close has resulted in accidents and many near misses. Alternative planning in the location has been refused due to the safety of vehicular access and movements. A footpath has similar implications compounded by the need to cross to join a footpath into the village.

Object

Representation ID: 2672

Received: 04/03/2023

Respondent: Mrs Janet Rogers

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The Old Hall Barn is a listed building. This dictates that the footpath must be at least a metre from the boundary. There is no benefit from introducing the footpath which would end at the highway with the nearest footpath on the opposite side of the road.

Object

Representation ID: 2725

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Ms Joanne Norris

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Vehicle access to the site needs to consider road safety. Up to 40% of the traffic (SAM2 data for 2022) entering and leaving the village is exceeding the speed limit in this area. Increasing housing density in this area will increase road traffic throughout the village and put more pressure on parking spaces around the shop and school as more parents drop and pick up their children.

Existing footpaths are narrow and difficult for two or more people to pass each other without stepping into the road. The informal footpath, created during Covid, should not be kept.

Object

Representation ID: 2732

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: mr johnny fincham

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Access to the proposed site at a very dangerous stretch of road close to junctions with Green
Lane and Eel Catcher Close Three accidents in last twelve months have been recorded.. Amber listing for the Highways safety is far to low.
The proposed route of the pathway to the back of Eel catcher close, would intrude on the very short gardens and therefore privacy of the residents. The pathway would open onto The Street where there is no pavement at all on that side where the road is very narrow and is on a
blind corner.

Object

Representation ID: 2839

Received: 06/03/2023

Respondent: Mr david easto

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

This is from the on site report enclosed:NCC Highways – Red. Satisfactory
access likely to require significant
removal of mature hedge and affect
substantial trees. Site remote from
local facilities with poor standard
footway, little if no scope for
improvement to satisfactory
standard. Outside village boundary. Site remote from
local facilities with poor standard
footway, little if no scope for
improvement to satisfactory
standard.

Object

Representation ID: 2958

Received: 08/03/2023

Respondent: Mr Peter Armitage

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Any exit onto New Inn Hill will be dangerous as visibilty is restricted by the gradient and bend of the road. Also vehicles, especilly delivery vans tend to go over the speed limit down the hill.

Object

Representation ID: 2985

Received: 08/03/2023

Respondent: Rockland St Mary With Hellington Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The proposed footpath would provide no benefit as it ends on the highway rendering the footpath useless.
Road safety would be compromised due to the increase of vehicular movements at this site.