37.6

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 2859

Received: 07/03/2023

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Manning

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

I object to this statement- The main settlement of Tacolneston was established well before the Domesday Book of 1086, this is the north area of the village where the Church, Pub and village primary school are located within the conservation area which also includes the southern gardens of the estate development of Dovedale, Knipe built in the 60's. (Not as suggested above)

A further settlement limit 1200m south offers no facilities/amenities, only housing established in more recent years.

Change suggested by respondent:

A more transparent character appraisal correctly identifying the center of the old established village including amenities (location)

Support

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 2946

Received: 07/03/2023

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Manning

Representation Summary:

I support - Extension settlement limits -site submission GNLPSL0016 , GNLPSL0016REV, GNLPSL0016REVB. Site assessment has't followed due process. It isn't subject to section 4, Offers vehicle access (granted 1949). The footpath directly connects site/facilities,. I disagree with highways- a 2 m footpath is't required in a rural community not urban.
Site assessment fails to include planning history 2021/1044, 2021/1045 granted- a benefit to the historical (public) asset-conversion of building to create annex to the listed building. An extension to the settlement boundary would be enabling, 2020/0048 demonstrates open space is achievable, removal -septic tank (AW) drains enables neutrality.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 3224

Received: 01/03/2023

Respondent: Tacolneston Parish Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Tacolneston Parish Council agree in principle to modest, well planned, development in the village. However, we have concerns on the soundness and appropriateness of these proposals. The proposals are unsound as the plans are inaccurate with anomalies in boundaries, size of plots and a general lack of clarity meaning that meaningful analysis and consultation is not possible.

Change suggested by respondent:

Our first concern is over the proportion of social housing to be included in the development. We ask that any development includes social and market housing, and that housing be targeted at the needs of local people and families.

Secondly, we ask that the development should include a mix of building types, in keeping with existing housing in the area. This would conserve the contour and aspect of the village.

Thirdly, we ask that we be provided with accurate and informative plans and maps. These should give accurate indications of the size of the proposed areas for development and clearly show the proposed and existing settlement boundaries.

Fourthly, we require information on how issues resulting from problems of drainage and increased traffic flow will be managed. Finally, we request an extension of the consultation period to allow for consideration by the council and parishioners of the updated proposals and materials.