40.14

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 2618

Received: 02/03/2023

Respondent: Mr Peter Thurgood

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

22 years ago this site had planning permission for 3 houses. I purchased Poppyfields knowing this and having consulted South Norfolk Council.
The density of the present proposal greatly exceeds the size of the plot which slopes down to the flood plain.

Change suggested by respondent:

The plot should be low density bungalows in order to respect its place in a traditional village setting.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 2758

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Thurlton Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council wish to state that the proposal to squeeze 15 houses into an extremely small and problematic site is, in our opinion, flawed and should be removed from consideration.
In addition to the 2016 application, 2 further applications were submitted to extend development on the site (2018/2593 & 2018/2594), but were subsequently withdrawn. However, in both cases Highways raised significant concerns about the standard of roadway through the development and the access to Beccles Road. In light of these the Parish Council ask that all 8 of the comments/recommendations from highways are considered again.

Change suggested by respondent:

In addition to the 2016 application, 2 further applications were submitted to extend development on the site (2018/2593 & 2018/2594), but were subsequently withdrawn. However, in both cases Highways raised significant concerns about the standard of roadway through the development and the access to Beccles Road. In light of these the Parish Council ask that all 8 of the comments/recommendations from highways are considered again.