40.14
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 2618
Received: 02/03/2023
Respondent: Mr Peter Thurgood
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
22 years ago this site had planning permission for 3 houses. I purchased Poppyfields knowing this and having consulted South Norfolk Council.
The density of the present proposal greatly exceeds the size of the plot which slopes down to the flood plain.
The plot should be low density bungalows in order to respect its place in a traditional village setting.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 2758
Received: 05/03/2023
Respondent: Thurlton Parish Council
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
The Parish Council wish to state that the proposal to squeeze 15 houses into an extremely small and problematic site is, in our opinion, flawed and should be removed from consideration.
In addition to the 2016 application, 2 further applications were submitted to extend development on the site (2018/2593 & 2018/2594), but were subsequently withdrawn. However, in both cases Highways raised significant concerns about the standard of roadway through the development and the access to Beccles Road. In light of these the Parish Council ask that all 8 of the comments/recommendations from highways are considered again.
In addition to the 2016 application, 2 further applications were submitted to extend development on the site (2018/2593 & 2018/2594), but were subsequently withdrawn. However, in both cases Highways raised significant concerns about the standard of roadway through the development and the access to Beccles Road. In light of these the Parish Council ask that all 8 of the comments/recommendations from highways are considered again.