QUESTION 90: Do you think

Comment

Representation ID: 651

Received: 27/07/2021

Respondent: Mr Magnus Magnusson

My client considers that their ‘rejected’ site (SN4086) should be allocated in addition to currently preferred sites SN0204, Swaderston & SN2038, Mulbarton.

Indeed, it is their view that their site is suitable (sustainable) for allocation within the VCHAP for the reasons outlined within the Supporting Statement that accompanies this submission and certainly when assessed against ‘Objective 3’ of the VCHAP.

Sites SN0204 & SN2038 both have issues (constraints) in respect of deliverability, that are not applicable to my client’s site.

Object

Representation ID: 1348

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Glavenhill Strategic Land

Agent: Lanpro Services Ltd

Please see attachments for full response.
We wish to see SN0496REV allocated within the VCHAP.
The site provides a suitable, available and deliverable opportunity to supplement housing supply within a sustainably-located settlement.
It can accommodate approximately 60 dwellings, including bungalows, a care home for elderly care and a doctors’ surgery. Alternatively, up to 95 dwellings could be provided without the care home and doctor’s surgery sites.
Social benefits of site will outweigh any harm to local heritage. Site is well contained and will be well screened from public view. Not considered that landscape/heritage impacts are so significant that they should preclude development of site.
It is otherwise accessible, well located in proximity to services and has no other technical constraints that would prevent its development.

Comment

Representation ID: 1431

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs A Gordon

SN4082(rejected)

The site connects to the existing settlement boundary. Reviewing the site assessment, it is proposed that the scale is limited to development of 1-3 dwellings-minimising the impact upon the higher plateau landscape, rural character of the area and the NSBLPZ. Access to be designed in accordance with CCHA. The site is within 1.8km of more than 3 core services, and 3km to school access and employment areas. The site fronts onto two popular existing foothpath and cycle routes- Edith Cavell Pilgrimage Route and Kett's Country Long Distance Path. Please refer to the revised site plan and additional detailed representation.

Object

Representation ID: 1576

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Humphrey Berney

Agent: La Ronde Wright Ltd

Site SN2087 - land South of Cuckoofield Lane, Bracon Ash - should be considered as a preferred site for new allocation under the Village Clusters Plan; to deliver 14no. dwellings and therefore meeting the objectives of the Plan. The consideration should take into account the improved access and landscaping afforded by inclusion now of small amounts of land to the immediate east, which is in the same ownership (revised site location plan and indicative layout plan provided).

Comment

Representation ID: 1680

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Mulbarton Parish Council

MPC agrees with SNC’s decision to reject the listed sites for the reasons given above in answer to Questions 1 to 4, Question 88, and the following reasons:
Education. This will impact on the already full Mulbarton Primary School and on the local secondary school
Medical facilities with the village are already overwhelmed
Current transport infrastructure cannot support more cars using the already congested B1113 with its bottleneck at the Harford Bridge junction

Comment

Representation ID: 1681

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Mulbarton Parish Council

SN0026SL Jasmine Cottage, The Street, Bracon Ash Agree with the reasons given for rejection, and:
• Cumulative impact on medical and educational provision in Mulbarton.
• Added traffic to the already congested B1113 to access Norwich.
• Lack of local amenities.

Comment

Representation ID: 1682

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Mulbarton Parish Council

SN0195 Land off the B1113 Norwich Road, Bracon Ash Agree with the reasons given for rejection, and:
• This site is amenity land adjacent to the Lark Rise estate, and should not be considered as available, suitable, or deliverable. Mulbarton Parish Council will oppose development.
• Cumulative impact on medical and educational provision in Mulbarton.
• Added traffic to the already congested B1113 to access Norwich.
• Lack of access to local amenities.
• No access to south of plot.
• North access/egress not to Highways standards.
• No access to existing infrastructure.
• Flood risk.

Comment

Representation ID: 1683

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Mulbarton Parish Council

SN0315 Land to the east of Mulbarton
Agree with the reasons given for rejection, and:
• Totally inappropriate in the context of the Village Clusters Plan objectives.
• Cumulative impact on medical and educational provision in Mulbarton.
• Added traffic to the already congested B1113 to access Norwich.
• Lack of access to local amenities

Comment

Representation ID: 1684

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Mulbarton Parish Council

SN0496REV Land north of Mulbarton
Agree with the reasons given for rejection, and:
• Diocese objected to the previous planning application re the footpath though the church yard and the possible tarmac and lighting being added which are totally out of context for the village and would be detrimental to Mulbarton Common and the conservation area.
• Over 650 residents signed a petition opposing the previous development on this site.
• Doctors Surgery was not backed by the Humbleyard Practice for Oakley Park this will probably be no different as the issue is a shortage of doctors, not facilities, at present.
• Application SN2020/1499 for three dwellings was recently refused. NCC commented: “The proposed development site lies on the edge of Mulbarton Common, close to the medieval parish church of St Mary Magdalen. In the past churchyards were frequently larger than they are today, so there is a possibility that human burials may be present within the development area. In addition, churches were normally located within or adjacent to medieval or earlier settlements and manorial centres, the remains of which may lie within the development area. Likewise, common edges were popular settlement sites from the late Anglo-Saxon period onwards. Consequently there is potential that heritage assets with archaeological interest
(buried archaeological remains) will be present at the site and that their significance will be adversely affected by the proposed development.”
• Unacceptable impact of another road junction onto the B1113 near Catbridge Lane.
• Cumulative impact on medical and educational provision in Mulbarton.
• Added traffic to the already congested B1113 to access Norwich.
• Lack of access to local amenities.

Comment

Representation ID: 1685

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Mulbarton Parish Council

SN2039 Land north of Rectory Lane, Mulbarton Agree with the reasons given for rejection, and:
• Outside the development area and settlement boundary for the parish
• Contrary to the Mulbarton Neighbourhood Plan
• Further impact on medical and educational provision in Mulbarton.
• Added traffic to the already congested B1113 to access Norwich.
• Limited access to area due to single track road, which has a width of 2.8 metres, has a weight limit of 7.5T and has dwellings either side.
• Access to either B1113 or A140 is poor and both roads running at capacity levels without taking into consideration extra housing at Long Stratton, Hempnall and Swainsthorpe.

Comment

Representation ID: 1686

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Mulbarton Parish Council

SN2087 South of Cuckoofield Lane, Bracon Ash Agree with the reasons given for rejection, and:
• Cumulative impact on medical and educational provision in Mulbarton.
• Added traffic to the already congested B1113 to access Norwich.
• Lack of access to local amenities

Comment

Representation ID: 1687

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Mulbarton Parish Council

SN4032 Land east of Norwich Road, Bracon Ash
• Cumulative impact on medical and educational provision in Mulbarton.
• Added traffic to the already congested B1113 to access Norwich.
• Lack of access to local amenities.
SN4059 Corner of Brick Kiln Lane, Mulbarton
• Cumulative impact on medical and educational provision in Mulbarton.
• Added traffic to the already congested B1113 to access Norwich.
• Lack of access to local amenities.
• Conflicts with the proposed EDF solar farm development