QUESTION 94: Do you support

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 328

Received: 06/07/2021

Respondent: Brockdish & Thorpe Abbotts Parish Council

Representation Summary:

We do not agree with the concept of a Village Cluster Plan. We agree that sites SN0385 off Church Road in Brockdish and SN0464SL off Mill Road in Thorpe Abbotts are both unsuitable for development.

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1962

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Water Management Alliance

Representation Summary:

See attachment for full response.
SN4069SL – Land south of Scole Road, Brockdish
Within the Waveney, Lower Yare and Lothingland IDD.
There are a series of riparian watercourses to the south of the proposed site.
Byelaw 3 applies to any proposed discharge of surface water from the proposed site.
All other Board Byelaws will also apply to this development.

Attachments:

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 2047

Received: 21/07/2021

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

See attachments for full response.
Site: SN4069SL, Land south of Scole Road, Brockdish
The site is located entirely within the Brockdish Conservation Area and opposite the grade II listed White House Farmhouse. Therefore, any development of this site has the potential to impact upon the significance of these heritage assets including the setting of the Farmhouse.
A heritage impact assessment of the site should be undertaken to assess the impact of the proposed development on the listed building and conservation area and determine if allocation of this site is appropriate, and if it is what mitigation may be required. The findings of the HIA should inform whether the site is allocated and if it is, the policy criterion including any mitigation and enhancement.
Complete an HIA to inform the allocation of the site including any mitigation, enhancement and policy wording.

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 2112

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA

Representation Summary:

SN4069SL
See attachment for full details.
Few or no constraints.
Standard information required at a planning stage. "1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: Yes
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: Minor flooding
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: 0.00 - 0.15cm.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: Minor flooding
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: 0.00 - 0.15cm.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): Yes - Internal Flooding|Yes - External Flooding
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): Yes|Ordinary Watercourse
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): Yes
5.] Source Protection Zone?: No
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: Waveney Valley
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of SAND AND GRAVEL. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised." "The site is in close proximity to a large number of internal flood events associated with Grove Road. This must be considered in the site assessment.

The on-site flood risk contributes to a major off-site flow path. A large percentage of the site is not at risk of flooding and has potential to be developed. We advise this must be considered in the site assessment.

The site is adjacent to a major flow path. We advise this must be considered in the site assessment.

Assessment: Green

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 2202

Received: 28/09/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Senior Ecologist

Representation Summary:

Green no major ecological constraints identified from desk-top search. Surveys, and biodiversity enhancement in accordance with policy required.
Site comprises small field at edge of settlement. Hedges are a priority habitat so losses should be avoided, minimised and as a last resort, compensated for. No other priority habitats are identified (see MAGIC). Site within amber habitat zones for great crested newts (pond adjacent). Site not within a SSSI IRZ. Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy, should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain.