QUESTION 101: Do you support

Support

Representation ID: 673

Received: 27/07/2021

Respondent: Pulham Market Parish Council

Pulham Market Parish Council support the preferred site SN1024. If this site is allocated Council request that the boundary is not extended into the land south towards Guild Hall Lane. Council consider that would have an unacceptable impact on the landscape and might encourage an application for access to Guild Hall Lane, currently an unclassified road and totally unsuitable for this purpose.

Support

Representation ID: 1167

Received: 01/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs Judith Fumero

Any additional housing should include a high percentage of affordable houses to buy or rent. We do not need more million pound houses in the village, we need homes that the younger generation in the village can afford to buy or have some prospect of buying. The village needs young families to ensure its future development.
Any development should ensure the integrity of the village's open spaces and any encroachment onto Guildhall Lane should be avoided. The lane is a safe place where all ages can walk and enjoy the views of the open fields without the fear of traffic.

Comment

Representation ID: 1790

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: South Norfolk Green Party

I would like to object to the name Ladbrookes for the possible ‘SN1024’ preferred allocation. Although it is spelt differently to the Ladbrokes betting chain, I hope that a new name will be considered if the site is eventually allowed ( with a high proportion of affordable, of course! )

Comment

Representation ID: 1964

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Water Management Alliance

See attachment for full response.
SN1024 – Ladbrookes, Tattlepot Lane, Pulham Market
Outside the IDD boundary, within the Waveney, Lower Yare and Lothingland IDB watershed catchment.
Major development - If surface water discharges within the watershed catchment of the Board's IDD, we request that this discharge is facilitated in line with the Non-statutory technical standards for sustainable drainage systems (SuDS).

Comment

Representation ID: 2048

Received: 21/07/2021

Respondent: Historic England

Please see attachments for full response.
Site: SN1024, Ladbrookes, Tattlepot Lane, Pulham Market
This site lies immediately adjacent to the Pulham Market Conservation Area. Therefore, any development of this site has the potential to impact upon the significance of the Conservation Area.
A heritage impact assessment of the site should be undertaken to assess the impact of the proposed development on the conservation area and determine if allocation of this site is appropriate, and if it is what mitigation may be required. The findings of the HIA should inform whether the site is allocated and if it is, the policy criterion including any mitigation and enhancement.
Complete an HIA to inform the allocation of the site including any mitigation, enhancement and policy wording

Comment

Representation ID: 2133

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA

See attachment for full response.
Few or no constraints. Standard information required at a planning stage.
"1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: Yes
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: Minor flooding
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: 0.00 - 0.15cm.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): Yes - Internal Flooding|Yes - External Flooding
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): Yes|Ordinary Watercourse
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: Source Protection Zone 3
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of DIAMICTON. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."
Assessment: Green

Comment

Representation ID: 2205

Received: 28/09/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Senior Ecologist

Green no major ecological constraints identified from desk-top search. Surveys, and biodiversity enhancement in accordance with policy required.
Site comprises field at edge of Pulham Market. Some hedges around perimeter, which are a priority habitat so losses should be avoided, minimised and as a last resort, compensated for. No other priority habitats are identified (see MAGIC). Site within green habitat zones for great crested newts and within strategic green infrastructure corridor. Site within a SSSI IRZ but residential development not a trigger for Natural England consultation. Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy, should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain.