QUESTION 115: Do you support

Showing comments and forms 1 to 6 of 6

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 460

Received: 19/07/2021

Respondent: Seething Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Although this site extends beyond the existing development boundary and is not therefore in keeping with the principle of infill, Seething Parish Council do not think that this would detrimentally affect the character of the village; indeed, it may be an ideal location for further development at a density equivalent to existing properties in Mill Lane. We do not identify any obvious major traffic or highway issues. The site is however, quite distant from the village centre.

Support

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 543

Received: 22/07/2021

Respondent: Otley Properties Ltd

Agent: John Long Planning

Representation Summary:

Otley Properties, on behalf of the landowners, can confirm that preferred site allocation: Site SN2148 Land to the west of Mill Lane, Seething remains available for development and the proposed allocation can be supported.

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1972

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Water Management Alliance

Representation Summary:

See attachment for full response.
SN2148 – Land to the west of Mill Lane, Seething
Outside the IDD boundary, within the Waveney, Lower Yare and Lothingland IDB watershed catchment.
Major development - If surface water discharges within the watershed catchment of the Board's IDD, we request that this discharge is facilitated in line with the Non-statutory technical standards for sustainable drainage systems (SuDS).

Attachments:

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 2144

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA

Representation Summary:

SN2148
See attachment for full comments
Few or no constraints.
Standard information required at a planning stage. 1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: Yes
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: Minor flooding
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: 0.00 - 0.15cm.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): No
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: No
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of SAND. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."

Assessment: Green

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 2166

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council

Representation Summary:

SN2148 - Frontage footway along with carriageway widening would be required.

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 2214

Received: 28/09/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Senior Ecologist

Representation Summary:

Green no major ecological constraints identified from desk-top search. Surveys, and biodiversity enhancement in accordance with policy required.
allocation to left of road, in agricultural field. No priority habitat identified e.g. hedges) (and see MAGIC). Site in amber risk zone for great crested newts. Site in SSSI IRZ but residential development does not trigger NE consultation. Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy, should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain.