QUESTION 134: Do you think

Support

Representation ID: 332

Received: 07/07/2021

Respondent: Mr Brian McGuire

I do not think that any of the rejected sites should be allocated instead of, or added to the preferred site SN4079.

Comment

Representation ID: 975

Received: 30/07/2021

Respondent: Tasburgh Parish Council

The rejected sites are not suitable for reconsideration for the same reasons as outlined at the time of original assessment.

Comment

Representation ID: 1589

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Orbit Homes

Agent: Armstrong Rigg Planning

See attached letter for full response.
Orbit Homes has reviewed the three other sites submitted for residential development in Tasburgh and it is clear that none of them are suitable for residential development due to their distance from the settlement, access and
highways issues and their impact on the historic environment and local townscape and landscape. We therefore agree with the Council’s assessment of these sites.