QUESTION 154: Do you think

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Support

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1024

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Wacton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

We are happy with no development planned whether or sites identified for the reasons submitted in the draft

Support

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1026

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Wacton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

we are happy with the findings

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1724

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Lanpro Services Ltd

Representation Summary:

Ref SN4029SL
Reasons the site has been considered unreasonable:
1. Access/Highways - an enclosed note from Schema Engineering advises that a new footpath will be required to link the site to the village. A footpath could be provided from the site westwards on the northern side of Stratton Road. There are limited existing footpath links within most villages and a more flexible approach may be needed in assessing sites.
2. Historic Environment - SNC Heritage Officer states that they consider there will be minimal impact on the setting of Wacton Hall. The scheme is considered unreasonable due to impact on historic character, but this is not reflected in the comments from SNC's Heritage Officer.

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1989

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Water Management Alliance

Representation Summary:

See attachment for full response.
Part of the Parish is located within the Norfolk Rivers IDD.
The Board’s byelaws apply to any new developments within the IDD.

Attachments: