QUESTION 155: Do you agree

Showing comments and forms 1 to 24 of 24

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 10

Received: 07/06/2021

Respondent: Mr Michael Savage

Representation Summary:

we feel that the any development in either of the two fields to the south of the village would be detrimental to the villages character and would lead to potential futer expansion

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 207

Received: 27/06/2021

Respondent: Professor Stephen Brown

Representation Summary:

Wicklewood village has a sprawling ribbon development footprint. Exclusion of the land at the centre of the "doughnut" from the settlement limit does not allow for consolidation into a coherent whole. The settlement limit should be extended to include the land at the centre.

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 435

Received: 16/07/2021

Respondent: Mrs Sallyann Weston

Representation Summary:

Your 'form and character' statement about the village is completely out of date.
Any developments should be restricted to infill the area in the centre of the village enclosed by Hackford/Wymondham Road, Church Lane and the High Street. Development within this area wouldn't change the character of the village

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 484

Received: 20/07/2021

Respondent: Mr John Seville

Representation Summary:

The statement regarding the windmill being shielded by leylandii trees at the roadside is incorrect. These trees were removed February 2015. Has someone from the team visit Wicklewood in the last 7 years?

The large open area of agricultural land, in the centre bounded by Wymondham Road, High Street, Hackford Road, Church Lane was mentioned in earlier local plans as being a particular feature of the village and development of this area would be detrimental to the form, character and rural setting of the village. This statement should be reinstated as development here would see the village double in size.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 494

Received: 20/07/2021

Respondent: Mr Vaughan Harrington

Representation Summary:

It establishes a new housing development in green fields on the south side, whereas nearly all residences are on the north side. An urban sprawl to me, which is only its beginning.

The location is situated on a dangerous bend, with restricted viewing near a school, which surely can not be safe.

Long term, it would limit future expansion of the school, and create an additional road hazard in a rural location, and it is noted the school is already at capacity. There are also no shops in Wicklewood either, so all retail purchases are "imported" by road.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 737

Received: 28/07/2021

Respondent: Dr Beatriz de la Iglesia

Representation Summary:

Wicklewood is not suitable for development of large housing states. It would alter the character of the village and it has insufficient facilities.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 745

Received: 28/07/2021

Respondent: -

Representation Summary:

There is not enough infrastructure in the village or surrounding area to support the proposed development. The increase in traffic will make the roads even more dangerous than they already are.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 754

Received: 28/07/2021

Respondent: Mrs Wendy Greaves

Representation Summary:

Traffic- I live opposite the school / proposed site. There are no traffic calming measures in place. Vehicles regularly exceed the 30mph speed limit on Hackford Road. With the school so close extra housing is an increased accident risk.

View - I currently have field views, this development would destroy that. This is a rural village with a nice country feel. We do not want urbanisation.

Pedestrians- The local amenities will be on the other side the village from the proposed development. Meaning pedestrians will need to cross the busy Hackford Road to access the bus stop / public house.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 768

Received: 28/07/2021

Respondent: Mr joel pailes

Representation Summary:

Both allocated sites fall outside the settlement boundary.
Numerous precedents in Wicklewood of planning refused due to settlement boundary.
Re-drawing settlement boundaries requires demonstrations of demand.
2008 – 2020 Wicklewood saw 39 new dwellings built, at 3.25 p/yr
At 1/4/21 permissions existed for 17 dwellings with 6 more AFD. 23 dwellings at a past delivery rate of 3.25 will complete 2028.
Local Plans reviewed every 5 years.
Therefore there is adequate provision for development at past absorption rates of 3.25 p/yr.
There is no need to allocate further land in Wicklewood until the Local plan is reviewed again March 2026.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 790

Received: 29/07/2021

Respondent: Mr John Lowe

Representation Summary:

Allocating the two sites shown would be detrimental to the form and character of Wicklewood. Using available land within the current settlement limit would be preferable.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 803

Received: 29/07/2021

Respondent: Mr James Braybrook

Representation Summary:

Limit is agreed but proposals exceed the limit by widening the Built environment both sides of Hackford Road. Green field site, development for the village can be accomplished by infill within existing settlement limit. Erodes the village boundary and leads to ongoing damaging trend of expanding villages so they start to merge with each other.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 907

Received: 30/07/2021

Respondent: Mr Philip Rothwell

Representation Summary:

The existing village boundary and development plan are perfectly acceptable precisely as they are. The village does not need to be extended.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 925

Received: 30/07/2021

Respondent: Mr Chris Baines

Representation Summary:

Any development South of Hackford Road would be harmful to the rural character of the village and inevitably lead to further urbanisation of the village. It would effectively split the village in two and permanently damage its nature.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 954

Received: 30/07/2021

Respondent: Mrs Alison Foyster

Representation Summary:

I do not think that the villagers will benefit from any further development, especially along the Hackford Road. There is already a development of 9 houses going ahead, which will increase the already over-used road through this village.
Who will benefit? The proposals are in excess of what the perceived needs may be. They will harm the character of the village, and create further devastation to the environment. It will open the floodgates to further unwanted and unnecessary development.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1042

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Ms sarah styles

Representation Summary:

Building a housing estate in a small village like Wicklewood will totally alter the character of the village. Loss of wildlife habitat , encroachment on a very successful village primary school and a strain on all local services.One track roads in the village,already very dangerous with sharp bends would be unusably by walker, or cyclists with the extra traffic caused by these developments.

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1047

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Mr Alan Highet

Representation Summary:

No. Wicklewood lacks sufficient road/other infrastructure to support extending the Settlement Limit(SL). Junctions with single-track lanes bordering the proposals, double bends and increasingly heavy/volumes of traffic mean Hackford Road is dangerous already. 4 accidents in 100m near school in recent years. (See separate letter). It would be harmful to the open spacious landscape character of the immediate locality, a positive influence to everyone's mental health travelling through Wicklewood. Proposal "thin edge of wedge". SNDC's policy "no more than 12-25 homes on any site(s)". Flash-flooding risk. Parish Council opposes development beyond the existing SL, that proposals imply. Opportunities exist for infill.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1089

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Ms Sue Knights

Representation Summary:

The description of the area surrounding the windmill is inaccurate as these trees were removed a number of years ago. The land that sat behind these trees has been since developed with 13 dwellings including affordable housing. This in itself should qualify and satisfy the proposed additional housing for this village under this scheme.
The marked boundaries shown on the map do not capture the full extent of the village.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1305

Received: 01/08/2021

Respondent: Ms Janet Parker

Representation Summary:

The limits are agreed but the proposals exceed the limits by widening the Built environments both sides of the Hackford Road. The development would be harmful to the open rural spacious character of the immediate locality. I fear that this would lead to ribbon / infill development down The Green and along the Wymondham Road.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1324

Received: 01/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Ralph Withers

Representation Summary:

No the Limits are agreed BUT the proposals exceed the limits by widening the Built environment both sides of Hackford Road. A development that will be harmful to the open rural spacious character of the immediate locality. Inevitably meaning ribbon/infill development down The Green and along the Wymondham Road.

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1396

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Simon O'Connor

Representation Summary:

There should not be any expansion to the existing Settlement Limit as this has already allowed more than sufficient expansion within the village to meet current and future targets. The winding main Hackford road passes to the south of the main settlement and therefore any expansion to the south of the Hackford road would constitute urban sprawl and lead to a village bisected by a busy and dangerous main road, this cannot be good for road safety or the overall rural feel of the village.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1485

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Anthony O'Connor

Representation Summary:

There should be no more expansion to Wicklewood village other than within the existing settlement as there are plenty of sites within the village to meet further expansion. The winding Hackford Road passes to the south of the main village leaving the village cut off from the proposed new development by a very dangerous road with several bends and a speed limit which is very seldom observed.

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1522

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs Heidi O'Connor

Representation Summary:

The existing settlement limit would seem to be more than sufficient to allow future development when needed without expanding it to the south of the busy Hackford road which would effectively cut the village in half with a busy main road, making it extremely dangerous for pedestrians especially the young and old.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1533

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Wicklewood Resident

Representation Summary:

I am very concerned that as a resident on the Hackford Road and at the edge of the previously agreed settlement limit, the new proprosals would severely impact our existing rural location and may lead to further ribbon/infill development down the Green and along the Wymondham Road.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1813

Received: 03/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Nigel Jones

Representation Summary:

No the Limits are agreed BUT the proposals exceed the limits by widening the Built environment both sides of Hackford Road. A development that will be harmful to the open rural spacious character of the immediate locality. Inevitably meaning ribbon/infill development down The Green and along the Wymondham Road.

Attachments: