QUESTION 161: Do you support

Comment

Representation ID: 1083

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Mr Peter Frost

If the desire is to encourage more families into the village and thus children walking to the school it is critical that the 30 speed limit is moved from its current position by Chapel Close to past the corner with the village hall.
In addition this development (in addition to SN4055) will bring significant increase in houses to the village and therefore to encourage less car journeys and travel for families some children related amenities such as a playground are really important to ensure these dwellings are incorporated into the village and add reduce the need for travel via car.

Object

Representation ID: 1164

Received: 01/08/2021

Respondent: G F Cole & Son Ltd

Site SN4050,
30 mph speed limit will need extending, site subject to flooding, due to water not having anywhere to go area to south un-cropable due to being to wet . Depending on design could be eyesore when entering village road side hedge would probably need removing. difficult to understand how this area if developed would not have anything other than a harmful impact on the local landscape and townscape

Support

Representation ID: 1283

Received: 01/08/2021

Respondent: countywide property services

This plot will fit in well with the existing houses ,good road frontage ,with careful consideration the hedge could remain ,good access with footpath to village amenities

Comment

Representation ID: 1992

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Water Management Alliance

See attachment for full response.
SN4050 – Land to the west of Hall Road, Winfarthing
Site is adjacent to the Waveney, Lower Yare and Lothingland IDD.
Major development – A riparian watercourse is located to the south of the proposed site. If surface water discharges within the watershed catchment of the Board's IDD, we request that this discharge is facilitated in line with the Non-statutory technical standards for sustainable drainage systems (SuDS).

Comment

Representation ID: 2123

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA

SN4050
See attachment for full details.
Few or no constraints.
Standard information required at a planning stage. "1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: No
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): Yes - Internal Flooding
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): Yes|Ordinary Watercourse
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: Source Protection Zone 3
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of DIAMICTON. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."

Assessment: Green

Comment

Representation ID: 2124

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA

SN4050
See attachment for full details.
Few or no constraints.
Standard information required at a planning stage. "1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: No
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): Yes - Internal Flooding
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): Yes|Ordinary Watercourse
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: Source Protection Zone 3
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of DIAMICTON. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."

Assessment: Green

Comment

Representation ID: 2239

Received: 28/09/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Senior Ecologist

Green no major ecological constraints identified from desk-top search. Surveys, and biodiversity enhancement in accordance with policy required.
Agricultural field bounded by heavily managed hedge. No other priority habitats identified onsite see MAGIC). Site in amber habitat zone for great crested newts. Site in SSSI IRZ, but residential development doesn't trigger consultation with Natural England. Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy, should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain.