QUESTION 162: Do you support

Comment

Representation ID: 378

Received: 12/07/2021

Respondent: Shelfanger Parish Council

Access to this Shelfanger, shortlisted site SNO399B would be directly onto the B1077 a dangerous thoroughfare.
Housing development would seriously increase the amount of run-off water from the site, limiting the area where surface water can naturally be absorbed.
The proposed site is at the centre of the village which has historically been seriously flooded, twice in the last 5 years, There is already an unresolved issue of surface water flowing into the crossroads from the small housing development to the west of the B1077 at that point during times of heavy rain. No school, no pub, no public transport

Comment

Representation ID: 1082

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Mr Peter Frost

I support but consideration needs to be given to encourage less car journeys and travel for families some children related amenities such as a playground are really important to ensure these dwellings are incorporated into the village and add reduce the need for travel via car.
In addition a 20s Plenty and relevent speed signs and flashing lights etc need to put up by the school nearby to reduce the speed of vehicles where these house are going

Object

Representation ID: 1143

Received: 01/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Firks

The land in question is home to various wildlife. We've had buzzards nesting nearby as well as green woodpeckers. This will have an immense impact on their well-being as well as the Winfarthing red deer who also live in the area. The track to the left of the land is used by walkers. The traffic at present tends to exceed the 30 speed limit and would prove dangerous to have the land developed increasing the number of vehicles pulling out onto the road. This would also impact the safety of the children attending the primary school.

Object

Representation ID: 1166

Received: 01/08/2021

Respondent: G F Cole & Son Ltd

Site SN4055 will have adverse effect on landscape and townscape site already subject to surface water flooding, visual impact on entering village will depend on good design . site subject to water run off from land to west. Too large a development for edge of village more suitable site available. would defiantly have harmful impact on landscape and townscape.

Comment

Representation ID: 1993

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Water Management Alliance

See attachment for full response.
SN4055 – Land off The Street, Winfarthing
Site is adjacent to the Waveney, Lower Yare and Lothingland IDD.
Major development - If surface water discharges within the watershed catchment of the Board's IDD, we request that this discharge is facilitated in line with the Non-statutory technical standards for sustainable drainage systems (SuDS).

Comment

Representation ID: 2061

Received: 21/07/2021

Respondent: Historic England

Please see attachments for full response.
Site: SN4055, Land off The Street, Winfarthing
Whilst there are no designated heritage assets on this site, the Winfarthing Conservation Area and grade II listed School house lie approximately 50 metres to the north of the site. Therefore, any development of this site that the potential to impact upon the significance of these heritage assets through development within the setting of the assets.
A heritage impact assessment of the site should be undertaken to assess the impact of the proposed development on the listed buildings and determine if allocation of this site is appropriate, and if it is what mitigation may be required. The findings of the HIA should inform whether the site is allocated and if it is, the policy criterion including any mitigation and enhancement.
Complete an HIA to inform the allocation of the site including any mitigation, enhancement and policy wording.

Comment

Representation ID: 2114

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA

See attachment for full details
SN4055

Few or no constraints.
Standard information required at a planning stage. "1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: Yes
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: Minor flooding
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: 0.00 - 0.30cm.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: Minor flooding
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: 0.00 - 0.60cm.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): Yes - Internal Flooding|Yes - External Flooding
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): Yes|Ordinary Watercourse
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: No
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of DIAMICTON. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised." "The on-site flood risk contributes to a major flow path adjacent to the site. Flow lines indicate this flood water flows northeast off of the site, contributing to a flow path east of the site. We advise this must be considered in the site assessment.

A large area of the site is unaffected by flood risk and has the potential to be developed."

Assessment: Green

Comment

Representation ID: 2173

Received: 26/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Nigel Dunscombe

Number of people: 2

We live directly opposite the proposed development in Winfarthing and have significant
flooding twice in the last 5 year,the last time just before Christmas last year.
The land involved for developmant has a significant towards the B1077 and further hard
standing for 25 houses would exacerbate the flooding issues.
The surface water from further up Winfarthing adds to the problem as the drainage system
becomes completely overwhelmed

Comment

Representation ID: 2241

Received: 28/09/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Senior Ecologist

Green no major ecological constraints identified from desk-top search. Surveys, and biodiversity enhancement in accordance with policy required.
Agricultural field bounded to north by hedge (priority habitat). No other priority habitats identified onsite see MAGIC). Site in amber/green habitat zone for great crested newts. Site in SSSI IRZ, but residential development doesn't trigger consultation with Natural England. Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy, should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain.