QUESTION 163: Do you think

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 492

Received: 20/07/2021

Respondent: Three Sisters Developments Ltd.

Agent: Lewis + Tyrrell Architects

Representation Summary:

In regard to site SN2049SL (Land south of Stocks Hill, Winfarthing) I would like to submit additional information to clarify that the proposed development would be compatible with the existing housing at Holly Farm and that it would not have a detrimental impact on the local landscape. The additional information also shows the vision splay of the existing road as approved in the previous planning application 2006/1903/F, which should hopefully alleviate the concerns raised by Highways, regarding the use of this access.

Support

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1085

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Mr Peter Frost

Representation Summary:

no, these 2 sites in winfarthing are suitable for housing if done well, with consideration for the speed limits, pathing and child amenties such as a playground, without they will put more pressure on a village already stretched and having all villagers having to drive.

Support

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1174

Received: 01/08/2021

Respondent: G F Cole & Son Ltd

Representation Summary:

SN0556, This site has never flooded in the forty plus years we have farmed it.
Entrance to site from highway can be easily achieved from neighbouring field, entrance to 50mph speed limit on B1077 easily achievable giving 160 meter plus visibility 4.5 meters back from highway. No hedges trees would need to be removed from site therefore no impact on landscape/townscape has access to existing footpaths at Chapel Close and south west corner , field level 1.25 meters above road increasing to above 2 meters nearer village. Need not be developed all at once allowing for local builders to participate.

Attachments:

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 2102

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA

Representation Summary:

SN0399BSL
See attachment for full details.
Few or no constraints.
Standard information required at a planning stage. "1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: Yes
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: Minor flooding
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: 0.00- 0.30cm.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): Yes - Internal Flooding|Yes - External Flooding
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): Yes|Main river
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: No
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of DIAMICTON. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised." "The site is in close proximity to a large number of internal flood events associated with Rectory Road. This must be considered in the site assessment.

The on-site flood risk contributes to a major flow path off-site. Flow lines indicate this flood water flows south off of the site, contributing to a flow path south of the site. We advise this must be considered in the site assessment.

A large area of the site is unaffected by flood risk and has the potential to be developed."

Assessment: Green

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 2242

Received: 28/09/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Senior Ecologist

Representation Summary:

Amber - measures required - priority habitat onsite or proximity to SSSI (recreational impact concerns) and or buffer required
SN0399B - located in Shelfanger. Hedges are priority habitat so any losses (which would appear to be substantial from the description) would need to be minimised (by design) and compensated for if the site is allocated. Site in amber habitat zone for great crested newts. Site in SSSI IRZ, but residential development doesn't trigger consultation with Natural England (unless 50 units or more) if allocated. Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy, should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain.