QUESTION 164: Do you think

Support

Representation ID: 1084

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Mr Peter Frost

both these sites are suitable but consideration for amenities, speed limits and proper paths need to be factored in.

Comment

Representation ID: 1560

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Keith Day Architects

re SN0399B site.
This site has a public footpath to its southern border adjoining a drainage ditch which is not owned.
The site is elevated from the highway and vision splays would be difficult to achieve without the removal of the hedge within the total width of the site and the bank. The field to the north has its own hedge and bank which would be a restriction to achieving vision splays
Despite it being a 30mph speed restriction ,in reality vehicles are often travelling at about 45-50mph at this point as the road runs down to the village centre