QUESTION 167: Do you support

Object

Representation ID: 244

Received: 30/06/2021

Respondent: Mrs Jill Youngman

As with previous site dangerous road

Object

Representation ID: 305

Received: 06/07/2021

Respondent: Woodton Parish Council

Woodton Parish Council does not support site SN0268SL as a Settlement Limit Extension, as this site is too far on the outreaches of the village.

Support

Representation ID: 1401

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: John Long Planning

The landowners can confirm that preferred settlement extension: Site SN0268SL, Land north of Church Road, Woodton can be supported and agree that any development is likely to be linear in form to reflect local character and appearance and could be developed alongside/combined with SN0262. The landowners are confident that the necessary infrastructure/service to support the development can be provided and have confirmation from Anglian Water that there is sufficient foul sewage capacity to accommodate flows from the site (and other sites in the village).

Comment

Representation ID: 1995

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Water Management Alliance

See attachment for full response.
SN0268SL – Land north of Church Road, Woodton
Outside the IDD boundary, within the Waveney, Lower Yare and Lothingland IDB watershed catchment.
Minor development – no further comments.

Comment

Representation ID: 2074

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA

See attachments for full response.
Few or no constraints. Standard information required at a planning stage.
"1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: No
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): No
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: Source Protection Zone 3
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of SAND AND GRAVEL. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."
Assessment: Green

Comment

Representation ID: 2245

Received: 28/09/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Senior Ecologist

Green no major ecological constraints identified from desk-top search. Surveys, and biodiversity enhancement in accordance with policy required.
Part of agricultural field bounded to south by a hedge - (priority habitat) - losses should be avoided - minimised, and as a last resort, compensated. No other priority habitats identified onsite see MAGIC). Site in amber habitat zone for great crested newts and in strategic GI corridor. Site in SSSI IRZ, but residential development doesn't trigger consultation with Natural England. Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy, should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain.