QUESTION 168: Do you support

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Support

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 306

Received: 06/07/2021

Respondent: Woodton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Woodton Parish Council supports SN0278 as a preferred site. Reasons for support are;
- Suitable access off Church Road
- Close proximity to Primary School
- Site links in well with the heart of the village
However, if site SN0278 is allocated we would emphasise that in present year, Woodton Primary School is at full capacity. This is without future residents in relation to the current FW Properties development on The Street being taken into account. Therefore, further children needing education as a result of development of SN0278 would require expansion of the primary school to accommodate the additional demand.

Support

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1751

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: ESCO DEVELOPMENTS

Agent: Brown and Co

Representation Summary:

We support the allocation of SN0278. However, we believe the site can accommodate approx 50 units, to include the entire site, as set out in the accompanying plan which shows the development in two phases.
This site is extremely well placed, given its location next to the primary school, its sustainable location, plus
the benefits the scheme would bring to the village. As previously documented, the development of the entire site south of Church Road would enable the benefits to be brought forward and would allow a more comprehensive scheme that would focus development to the south of Church Road.
The benefits and justification for a scheme of 50 units are discussed in the attached documents.

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 1996

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Water Management Alliance

Representation Summary:

See attachment for full response.
(Northern End of) SN0278 – Land south of Church Road, Woodton
Outside the IDD boundary, within the Waveney, Lower Yare and Lothingland IDB watershed catchment.
Major development - If surface water discharges within the watershed catchment of the Board's IDD, we request that this discharge is facilitated in line with the Non-statutory technical standards for sustainable drainage systems (SuDS).

Attachments:

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 2075

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA

Representation Summary:

See attachments for full response.
Few or no constraints. Standard information required at a planning stage.
"1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: No
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): Yes - Internal Flooding
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: Source Protection Zone 3
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of SAND AND GRAVEL. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."
Assessment: Green

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Representation ID: 2246

Received: 28/09/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Senior Ecologist

Representation Summary:

Green no major ecological constraints identified from desk-top search. Surveys, and biodiversity enhancement in accordance with policy required.
Part of agricultural field bounded to east by a hedge (between site and recreation ground) (priority habitat). No other priority habitats identified onsite see MAGIC). Site in amber habitat zone for great crested newts (pond onsite) and in strategic GI corridor. Site in SSSI IRZ, but residential development doesn't trigger consultation with Natural England. Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy, should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain.