Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Reg. 19 Pre-submission Addendum

Representation ID: 3856

Received: 04/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Keith Weston

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Ditchingham Parish Council objected to the original proposal unless the access is changed from Hamilton Way. The Council repeats its objection with the extra proposed dwellings.

Change suggested by respondent:

No more dwellings should access the site via Hamilton Way/Rider Haggard Way. Instead access should be via Waveney Road or Thwaite Road.

Keith Weston (Chair Ditchingham Parish Council)

Full text:

Ditchingham Parish Council objected to the original proposal unless the access is changed from Hamilton Way. The Council repeats its objection with the extra proposed dwellings.

Object

Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Reg. 19 Pre-submission Addendum

Representation ID: 4008

Received: 02/10/2024

Respondent: Ditchingham Farms Partnership

Agent: Evolution Town Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Please see the submitted representation statement. The extension to site VC DIT1 REV is not a sound amendment to the SNVC Housing Allocations Plan. Other sides such as the land adjoining Wildflower Way represent a more sustainable allocation. Without consulting on wider sites to cover the projected housing land shortfall, we consider the plan unsound, and legally non-compliant and that it has not been prepared in compliance with the duty to cooperate.

Change suggested by respondent:

Please see the submitted representation statement. Alternative allocations such as the land adjoining Wildflower Way should be considered as to fill the projected housing delivery shortfall.

Full text:

Please see the submitted representation statement. The extension to site VC DIT1 REV is not a sound amendment to the SNVC Housing Allocations Plan. Other sides such as the land adjoining Wildflower Way represent a more sustainable allocation. Without consulting on wider sites to cover the projected housing land shortfall, we consider the plan unsound, and legally non-compliant and that it has not been prepared in compliance with the duty to cooperate.

Attachments: