A.1.

Support

Representation ID: 2282

Received: 27/01/2023

Respondent: Mr Peter Porter

I am fully supportive of the whole plan as it aims to provide additional accommodation in many rural parts of the District. This will enable young people, especially, to remain in their locality and to sustain local services and facilities. Overall the plan will also contribute to the required increase in housing during the next few years.

Object

Representation ID: 2322

Received: 14/02/2023

Respondent: CPRE Norfolk

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

The SNVCHAP should not be running on a different timetable to the GNLP. The housing numbers are unnecessarily high and unsound, in part due to housing within the SNVCHAP being located in more unsustainable locations which will affect the ability of the GNLP authorities to meet Climate Change targets.

Object

Representation ID: 2575

Received: 01/03/2023

Respondent: Chris Williams

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

The Cluster plan is unsound , little villages like Bawburgh deserve to stand on their own and not be swallowed up, 35 houses would make no difference on a big site. This is huge , we can't cope. The road is already a rat run, unleashing 70 odd more cars plus service vehicles on and off a small hill will be dangerous . the village green is already over crowded particularly in the summer months. The school is overcrowded. The sewage system overflows, The river can't cope with more rain water surges. Few pathways or public transport. Leave the view.

Support

Representation ID: 2802

Received: 06/03/2023

Respondent: Bunwell Parish Council

Bunwell has an ideal windfall site GNLP 2126 of 0.52 hectares which is conveniently placed in the village centre. The Settlement Limit passes across one third of the site. Given the above consultation statement, this would have been a good opportunity to reposition the Settlement Limit to the site borders for future development opportunities of the entire site. Other than three developed sites, no ‘provision’ whatsoever appears to have been made to the village limits and we would question the soundness of the Settlement Limit assessments by not doing so.

Support

Representation ID: 3027

Received: 08/03/2023

Respondent: Breckland District Council

Breckland Council Supports the South Norfolk Village Cluster Development Strategy proposals. Breckland Council welcomes the opportunity to engage with South Norfolk on these proposals when they come forward in line with the Statement of Common Ground agreed between Breckland District Council and the Greater Norwich Partnership which South Norfolk Council is a partner.

Object

Representation ID: 3063

Received: 02/03/2023

Respondent: Welbeck Strategic Land III Ltd

Agent: James Bailey Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Although JBPL and Welbeck Land welcome the progression of the VCHAP, it is felt this should be considered at the same time as the rest of the GNLP. It
remains difficult to comprehend that two interrelated documents are being considered on separate timetables. Especially, as the VCHAP must deliver a minimum of 1,200 dwellings to support the GNLP meeting its need of over 49,000 dwellings over the plan period. These representations conclude that the VCHAP will unlikely deliver the 1,200 dwellings required, and in turn will
significantly undermine the GNLP that is already being drastically constrained by the Nutrient Neutrality issue.