Site map
- Consultations
- Login
- Register
- Accessibility
- Privacy
- Cookies
- Instructions
- Historic documents
-
- Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Reg. 19 Pre-submission Addendum
- Representation search for Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Reg. 19 Pre-submission Addendum
- Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Reg. 19 Pre-submission Addendum: Supporting Documents
- Representation search for Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Reg. 19 Pre-submission Addendum: Supporting Documents
- VCHAP Reg 18 Alternative Sites & Focused Changes - Supporting Documents
- Representation search for VCHAP Reg 18 Alternative Sites & Focused Changes - Supporting Documents
- Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
- Representation search for Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
-
- A. Introduction and Background
- Context for the Current Consultation
- The Assessment of Sites
- Evidence Base
- The Consultation
- Village Cluster Chapters
- 1. Alpington, Yelverton and Bergh Apton
-
- Representations made against QUESTION 2a: Do you agree with the allocation of SN0433, Land south of Wheel Road, Alpingtonfor at least 12 dwellings on an area of 1.0ha? Please explain your response.
- Representations made against QUESTION 2b: If the site is allocated, do you think there are any specific requirements that should be set out in the allocation policy?
- 2. Barford, Marlingford, Colton and Wramplingham
-
- Representations made against QUESTION 3a: Do you agree with the allocation of SN6000, Land north of Chapel Street, Barford? Please explain your response.
- Representations made against QUESTION 3b: If the site is allocated, do you think there are any specific requirements that should be set out in the allocation policy?
- Representations made against QUESTION 4a: Do you agree with the allocation of SN0552REVC, Land north of Watton Road, Barford, as an extension to VC BAR1, for up to 20 additional dwellings on an area of 0.73ha? Please explain your response.
- Representations made against QUESTION 4b: If the site is allocated, do you think there are any specific requirements that should be set out in the allocation policy?
- 3. Barnham Broom, Kimberley, Carleton F., Runhall and Brandon Parva
-
- Representations made against QUESTION 5a: Do you agree with the allocation of SN0055, Land east of Spur Road and south of Norwich Road, Barnham Broom, for approximately 15 dwellings on an area of 1.0ha? Please explain your response.
- Representations made against QUESTION 5b: If the site is allocated, do you think there are any specific requirements that should be set out in the allocation policy?
- 4. Bawburgh
- 5. Ditchingham, Broome, Hedenham and Thwaite
-
- Representations made against QUESTION 7a: Do you agree with the proposed allocation of VC DIT1 REV, Land at Thwaite Road and Tunney's Lane, Ditchingham, for up to 45 dwellings on an area of on an area of 2.42ha? Please explain your response.
- Representations made against QUESTION 7b: Do you think there are any specific requirements that should be added to the allocation policy to accommodate the extra 10 dwellings?
- Representations made against QUESTION 8a: Do you agree with the proposed allocation of SN4020, Land west of Old Yarmouth Road, Broome forat least 12 dwellings on an area of 0.76ha? Please explain your response.
- Representations made against QUESTION 8b: If the site is allocated, do you think there are any specific requirements that should be set out in the allocation policy?
- 6. Earsham
-
- Representations made against QUESTION 9a: Do you agree with the allocation of SN0218REV, Land north of The Street, Earshamfor up to 25 dwellings on an area of 1.4ha? Please explain your response.
- Representations made against QUESTION 9b: If the site is allocated, do you think there are any specific requirements that should be set out in the allocation policy?
- 7. Gillingham, Geldeston, and Stockton
-
- Representations made against QUESTION 10a: Do you agree with the proposed allocation VC GIL1 REV, South of Geldeston Road and Daisy Way, Gillingham, on 2.92ha, for approximately 40 dwellings. Please explain your response.
- Representations made against QUESTION 10b: Do you think there are any specific requirements that should be added to the allocation policy to accommodate the extra 5 dwellings?
- 8. Mulbarton, Bracon Ash, Swardeston and East Carleton
-
- Representations made against QUESTION 11a: Do you agree with the proposed increase in density on allocation VC SWA2, Land on Main Road, Swardeston, to accommodate approximately 40 dwellings? Please explain your response.
- Representations made against QUESTION 11b: Do you think there are any specific requirements that should be added to the allocation policy to accommodate the extra 10 dwellings?
- 9. Spooner Row and Suton
-
- Representations made against QUESTION 12a: Do you agree with the proposed allocation VC SPO1 REV, Land west of Bunwell Road, Spooner Row, for approximately 35 dwellings on 2.34ha? Please explain your response.
- Representations made against QUESTION 12b: Do you think there are any specific requirements that should be added to the allocation policy to accommodate the extra 20 dwellings? Please tick the ‘comment’ button in your response and complete the associated text box.
- 10. Tacolneston and Forncett End
-
- Representations made against QUESTION 13a: Do you agree with the boundary of revised allocation VC TAC1 REV, Land to the west of Norwich Road, Tacolneston, to facilitate 'approximately 25 dwellings' on 1.0ha? Please explain your response.
- Representations made against QUESTION 13b: Do you think there are any specific requirements that should be added to the allocation policy to reflect these changes?
- 11. Wicklewood
-
- Representations made against QUESTION 14a: Do you agree with the proposed allocation VC WIC1 REV, Land to the south of Wicklewood Primary School, to accommodate up to 40 dwellings on 2.97ha? Please explain your response.
- Representations made against QUESTION 14b: Do you think there are any specific requirements that should be added to the allocation policy to accommodate the extra 10 dwellings?
- Glossary
- South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
- Representation search for South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
-
- A. Introduction and Background
- The Plan Objectives
-
- Representations made against A.24. The following sets out
- Representations made against SNVC Objective 1 - Meet housing needs
- Representations made against SNVC Objective 2 - Protect village communities and support rural services and facilities
- Representations made against SNVC Objective 3 - Protect the character of villages and their settings
- The Assessment of Sites
- Evidence Base
- Monitoring
- Village Cluster Chapters
- Monitoring Framework
- Glossary
- Appendix A: List of New and Carried Forward Allocations
- Appendix B: Summary of Changes to Settlement Limits
- Appendix C: Housing Trajectory
- South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Draft) - Supporting Documents
- Representation search for South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Draft) - Supporting Documents
- Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Site Assessments
- Representation search for Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Site Assessments
- Call for site form
- Representation search for Call for site form
- South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
- Representation search for South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
-
- Introduction and Background
- The Plan Objectives
- Core policies
- The Assessment of Sites
- Evidence Base
- Monitoring
- Alburgh and Denton
- Alpington, Yelverton and Bergh Apton
- Aslacton, Great Moulton and Tibenham
- Barford, Marlingford, Colton and Wramplingham
- Banham Broom, Kimberley, Carleton Forehoe, Runhall and Brandon Parva
- Bawburgh
- Bressingham
- Brooke, Kirstead and Howe
- Bunwell
- Burston, Shimpling and Gissing
- Carleton Rode
- Dickleburgh
- Ditchingham, Broome, Hedenham and Thwaite
- Earsham
- Forncett St Mary and Forncett St Peter
- Gillingham, Geldeston, and Stockton
- Hales and Heckingham, Langley with Hardley, Carleton St Peter, Claxton, Raveningham and Sisland
- Hempnall, Topcroft Street, Morningthorpe, Fritton, Shelton and Hardwick
- Heywood
- Keswick and Intwood
- Ketteringham
- Kirby Cane and Ellingham
- Little Melton and Great Melton
- Morley and Deopham
- Mulbarton, Bracon Ash, Swardeston and East Carleton
- Needham, Brockdish, Starston and Wortwell
- Newton Flotman and Swainsthorpe
- Pulham Market and Pulham St Mary
- Rockland St Mary, Hellington and Holverston
- Roydon
- Saxlingham Nethergate
- Scole
- Seething and Mundham
- Spooner Row and Suton
- Stoke Holy Cross, Shotesham and Caistor St Edmund & Bixley
- Surlingham, Bramerton and Kirby Bedon
- Tacolneston and Forncett End
- Tasburgh
- Tharston, Hapton and Flordon
- Thurlton and Norton Subcourse
- Thurton and Ashby St Mary
- Tivetshall St Mary and Tivetshall St Margaret
- Toft Monks, Aldeby, Haddiscoe, Wheatacre and Burgh St Peter
- Wacton
- Wicklewood
- Winfarthing and Shelfanger
- Woodton and Bedingham
- Wrenningham, Ashwellthorpe and Fundenhall
- Monitoring Framework
- Glossary
- Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18) - Supporting Documents
- Representation search for Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18) - Supporting Documents
- Reg. 18 - New & Revised Sites Promoted
- Representation search for Reg. 18 - New & Revised Sites Promoted
- South Norfolk Council Committee Papers
-
- VCHAP (Proposed Reg. 19 Version) - Documents for South Norfolk Committees
- Representation search for VCHAP (Proposed Reg. 19 Version) - Documents for South Norfolk Committees
- VCHAP Regulation 19 Pre-submission Addendum - Documents for South Norfolk Committees
- Representation search for VCHAP Regulation 19 Pre-submission Addendum - Documents for South Norfolk Committees