A.17. The Regulation 19
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 2324
Received: 14/02/2023
Respondent: CPRE Norfolk
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
The SNVCHAP should not be running on a different timetable to the GNLP. The housing numbers are unnecessarily high and unsound, in part due to housing within the SNVCHAP being located in more unsustainable locations which will affect the ability of the GNLP authorities to meet Climate Change targets.
To address these issues and to make the two plans sound they should run to the same timetable. As outlined above the inclusion of unnecessary housing numbers within the SNVCHAP in unsustainable locations also makes the SNVCHAP unsound. Therefore the SNVCHAP should not be adopted.
Support
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 2822
Received: 06/03/2023
Respondent: JCPC Ltd
Having read the Plan in full, it is considered the document is sound, justified and fully compliant
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 2884
Received: 07/03/2023
Respondent: Kirby Cane Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Because of the separation of the VCHAP from the GNLP and the subsequent varying of the consultation timetables, both are unsound. This also raises questions about the number of houses allocated by the VCHAP and whether they are in fact needed at all.
The timetable of consultations should be regularised.