2.11

Object

Representation ID: 2420

Received: 23/02/2023

Respondent: Ms Susan Stacey

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

The site assessment form contains omissions and potential errors. Accessibility - no mention of lack of footpaths to bus stop on X2 route or Aldis farm shop. Distances to Village Hall (250m) and Yelverton Football Club pavilion (550m) incorrect. YFC pavilion is closer to site than the Village Hall. No mention that St Mary’s Church is Grade 1 listed and flagged as red in GIS analysis- why wasn’t this covered in the Heritage Impact Assessment?
These inaccuracies lead to a lack of confidence in the site assessment process.

Object

Representation ID: 2422

Received: 23/02/2023

Respondent: Mrs Lesley McNulty

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Any future development should be for bungalows only. Not a majority of houses and a handful of bungalows but all bungalows. Much is made of larger houses being underoccupied. This is likely driven by the lack of bungalows being built and nowhere suitable to move to and stay local if that is the preference.

Object

Representation ID: 2472

Received: 26/02/2023

Respondent: Yelverton Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

The site may be "visually well contained", but the access is constrained to a single entry point, through two previous developments with cars regularly parked on the road partially obstructing the flow of traffic. Another 25 houses will significantly add to the traffic flow though an area where children play in the street outside their houses.
On days when the local football club play, Church Meadow is completely overwhelmed by overspill cars from football supporters and there have historically been issues of access for residents and potentially for emergency vehicles. New houses will exacerbate this.

Object

Representation ID: 2782

Received: 06/03/2023

Respondent: Mr David Whitehead

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

I fully endorse the previous objections to development on this site. Access through the existing development will make the roads busy and dangerous.

Object

Representation ID: 2880

Received: 07/03/2023

Respondent: Mr Chris Poundall

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

We chose to live in Alpington because we wanted to live in a rural village and enjoy the benefits of the countryside and its views.

If the SN 0400/VC ALP1 site is built upon, it will probably completely ruin our view of the field and trees on the Western side edge of Church Meadow and may have a detrimental effect on the value of our property.