Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 2637

Received: 03/03/2023

Respondent: Mr Nigel Kippin

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The additional area is at odds with the present linear village. The highway and infrastructure does not support this additional housing. The exit for this land is onto a section of highway with limited view and has safety implications to road users.

Change suggested by respondent:

The reduction in land to support only linear growth adjacent to the existing highway as the existing dwellings.

Full text:

The additional area is at odds with the present linear village. The highway and infrastructure does not support this additional housing. The exit for this land is onto a section of highway with limited view and has safety implications to road users.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 2692

Received: 04/03/2023

Respondent: Mrs Tamlyn Francis

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The site already has farm vehicles accessing the land. The road cannot cope with a further influx of cars on a hill with bad visibility and a history of accidents. Eel Catcher Close was a special exception as it was affordable housing, planning applications have already been refused on the site. There is no precedent for this development. This is already the end of the village and to go ahead with this site would be outside of the linear nature of the existing housing.

Change suggested by respondent:

The plan needs to be abandoned. The environmental impact is too great.

Full text:

The site already has farm vehicles accessing the land. The road cannot cope with a further influx of cars on a hill with bad visibility and a history of accidents. Eel Catcher Close was a special exception as it was affordable housing, planning applications have already been refused on the site. There is no precedent for this development. This is already the end of the village and to go ahead with this site would be outside of the linear nature of the existing housing.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 2713

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Ms Joanne Norris

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The size of the area is larger than the 1ha stated in National Policy A7.

Change suggested by respondent:

Areas within the stated National Policy need to be identified.

Full text:

The size of the area is larger than the 1ha stated in National Policy A7.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Representation ID: 2983

Received: 08/03/2023

Respondent: Rockland St Mary With Hellington Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

As advised in 2021 the site is outside the development area, Eel Catcher Close was developed under Rural Exception Site, for social housing only, Eel Catcher Close was (is) an exception site and a public assurance was given of no further development here with two planning applications being refused since the site was built.

Change suggested by respondent:

No further planning at a Rural Exception Site.

Full text:

As advised in 2021 the site is outside the development area, Eel Catcher Close was developed under Rural Exception Site, for social housing only, Eel Catcher Close was (is) an exception site and a public assurance was given of no further development here with two planning applications being refused since the site was built.

Attachments: