Comment

Representation ID: 601

Received: 24/07/2021

Respondent: Pulham St Mary Parish Council

Pulham St Mary Parish Council do not think that any of the shortlisted or rejected sites should be allocated instead of, or in addition to, the preferred site. The Council are happy to support the preferred site SN1052REV as they believe it best supports the ongoing requirement of housing needs within Pulham St Mary.

Comment

Representation ID: 639

Received: 26/07/2021

Respondent: Brown & Co

Site SN0418 is suitable for residential development and should be allocated through the Plan. Development could be accommodated at the site without significant adverse impacts upon the wider landscape or nearby heritages assets, would facilitate enhancements to the approach to the village from the north, deliver at least 10% biodiversity net gain, and provide pedestrian and cycle access to the recreation ground. The accompanying illustrative masterplan indicates how the site could be delivered.

Comment

Representation ID: 674

Received: 27/07/2021

Respondent: Pulham Market Parish Council

Pulham Market Parish Council do not think that any of the shortlisted or rejected sites should be allocated instead of, or in addition to, the preferred site. The Council are happy to support the preferred site SN1024 as they believe it best supports the ongoing requirement of housing needs within Pulham Market.

Comment

Representation ID: 746

Received: 28/07/2021

Respondent: Durrants

On behalf of the landowner of SN0363SL, we do not agree with the rejection of the site. It is not agreed that access is problematic, with two established access' off Station Rd, which facilitate properties of the Maltings and other housing with on site car parking.

Two dwellings north of the site were constructed as recently opposite the Maltings, with no mention of a detrimental impact on the Maltings or townscape. It is difficult to understand how a development in close proximity could now have a detrimental impact. We ask the LPA to consider their stance on this site submission.

Comment

Representation ID: 1540

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Durrants

Heritage impact can be mitigated by sensitive design, the surrounding area is already built up with a range of modern properties.
There is no rural impact as the surrounding area is already built up.
Highways issues can be resolved through allocation of a short length of footpath which will benefit the other properties in the area connecting them with the village centre.

Comment

Representation ID: 1602

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Durrants

We disagree that site would have unacceptable impact on townscape and heritage assets. Recent development in the village has occurred close to heritage assets and we do not believe a development on this site would cause unacceptable impact to listed buildings in the vicinity. Landscape mitigation could be included to address and issues and the site could form a suitable settlement extension to match that of the opposite site of Colegate End road to the west.

Comment

Representation ID: 2096

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA

SN1027
See attachment for full details.
Few or no constraints.
Standard information required at a planning stage. "1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: No
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): Yes - External Flooding
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): Yes
5.] Source Protection Zone?: Source Protection Zone 3
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of DIAMICTON. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."

Assessment: Green

Comment

Representation ID: 2101

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA

See attachment for full details.
SN0418

Few or no constraints.
Standard information required at a planning stage. "1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: No
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): No
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): Yes
5.] Source Protection Zone?: Source Protection Zone 3
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of DIAMICTON. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."

Assessment: Green

Comment

Representation ID: 2207

Received: 28/09/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Natural Environment Team

Green no major ecological constraints identified from desk-top search. Surveys, and biodiversity enhancement in accordance with policy required.
SN0417 - Field bounded by hedges around perimeter, which are a priority habitat so losses should be avoided, minimised and as a last resort, compensated for. No other priority habitats are identified (see MAGIC). Site within amber habitat zones for great crested newts and strategic GI corridor. Site within a SSSI IRZ but residential development not a trigger for Natural England consultation. Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy, should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain.

Green no major ecological constraints identified from desk-top search. Surveys, and biodiversity enhancement in accordance with policy required.
SN1027 - Site comprises field at northern edge of Pulham Market. Hedges around perimeter, which are a priority habitat so losses should be avoided, minimised and as a last resort, compensated for. No other priority habitats are identified (see MAGIC). Site within amber habitat zones for great crested newts. Site within a SSSI IRZ but residential development not a trigger for Natural England consultation. Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy, should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain.

Comment

Representation ID: 2267

Received: 28/09/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Natural Environment Team

Green no major ecological constraints identified from desk-top search. Surveys, and biodiversity enhancement in accordance with policy required.
SN1027 - Site comprises field at northern edge of Pulham Market. Hedges around perimeter, which are a priority habitat so losses should be avoided, minimised and as a last resort, compensated for. No other priority habitats are identified (see MAGIC). Site within amber habitat zones for great crested newts. Site within a SSSI IRZ but residential development not a trigger for Natural England consultation. Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy, should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain.