Comment

Representation ID: 1369

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Philip Ellis

Part of SN0531 adversely affects the linear and rural nature of RSM, the landscape and townscape, its context to The Broads and heritage assets.

It is readily visible on a high ridge, is backland development, not sustainably located having a negative environmental impact.

Reducing the units due to heritage assets and landscaping set-back from NIH, the combined sites do not meet "viability assessment" profitability tests increasing pressure for larger developments or reduced Affordable Housing, becoming a "Trojan Horse" for further backland development.

The footpath proposed is unnecessary being distant from amenities adding an unnecessary crossing to one existing at ECC.