Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
Representation ID: 878
Received: 29/07/2021
Respondent: Mr Charles Jurak
Representation Summary:
In summary, I strongly object to “SN4002 SL” being put forward as a development site. I cannot understand from an ecological viewpoint how a veteran woodland covered by a TPO could be allowed to be destroyed. There are various species of trees not to mention the wildlife dependant on them. From a modern standpoint, the woodland offers a buffer for noise pollution and also between the bungalows and Ellingham house.