QUESTION 8: Do you support

Comment

Representation ID: 2028

Received: 21/07/2021

Respondent: Historic England

Please see attachments for full response.
Site SN0400 Church Meadow, Alpington
Although this site is located quite close to the grade, I listed St Mary’s Church, the site is tucked behind existing development and so the impact on the heritage asset and its setting would be minimal.

Comment

Representation ID: 2088

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA

See attachments for full response.
Mitigation required for heavy constraints. Standard information required at a planning stage.
"1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: Yes
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: Minor flooding|Moderate flooding
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: 0.00- 0.30cm.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): No
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: Source Protection Zone 3
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of DIAMICTON. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised." "The on-site flood risk forms the start of a moderate flow path in the 0.1% AEP event, dissecting the site south-north to roughly the north-centre of the site. Flow lines indicate this flood water flows south off of the site, contributing to a major flow path south of the site. We advise this must be considered in the site assessment.
A large area of the site is unaffected by flood risk and has the potential to be developed."
Assessment: Green

Comment

Representation ID: 2187

Received: 28/09/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Senior Ecologist

Rating: Green no major ecological constraints identified from desk-top search. Surveys, and biodiversity enhancement in accordance with policy required.
Site appears to be used for grazing and is surrounded on all sides by hedges (priority habitat). The site partly lies within the amber zone for DLL and a PROW runs to the north of the site. A search of MAGIC reveals there are no other priority habitats onsite. Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain.