16.1
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 2436
Received: 23/02/2023
Respondent: Mr Eliot Ross
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The blind bend is a consistent problem, with the current level of traffic this is already hard to negotiate and with the addition of the houses proposed this will become a nightmare for existing and new residents alike.
An alternative route for the new houses planned to keep new traffic away and reduce existing traffic from the current residents.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 2438
Received: 23/02/2023
Respondent: Miss Lucy Butcher
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
I'm extremely concerned about the safety of the villagers who live along the road with increased traffic. It's a struggle to pull out safely as it is with the traffic flow. When traffic is diverted through the village due to accidents the road simply cannot take the increased traffic and it has become congested with buses and lorries reversing around the bend to let oncoming cars through.
Parents with children, the elderly and disabled and people such as my self who need to transport equipment to and from their vehicles for work need to park along the street.
The plans for the development of the estate to be cancelled. I do not want another housing estate to look at, it will ruin the beautiful public foot path I use on a daily basis. Gillingham lacks pavements and the footpath across the fields is used by dog walkers and families.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 2443
Received: 24/02/2023
Respondent: Ms Tamsin Watt
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The development of VC GIL1 is not in line with the NPPF and will not enhance the rural community. The allocation of the site for up to 35 dwellings, represents gross over-development of a Service Village, particularly when taken alongside the previous development 2022/1897 at Fieldgate Reach which was completed only in summer 2022. The effects of which are not yet fully understood and not fully assessed within the Village Clusters Plan Supporting documentation. It is unclear why Gillingham is being subjected to such high levels of development which are out of keeping with the rural character of the village
The allocation of VC GIL1 is not appropriate for the reasons outlined above. From the documentation provided it is not clear how this site was allocated as preferred over the other sites considered within the area. This is not in keeping the NPPF and does not demonstrate sound decision making. The allocation of this site should be reviewed.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 2479
Received: 27/02/2023
Respondent: Mrs Tina Twitchett
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
My objection to this development is due to the inadequate infastructure which surrounds it.
Local schools, GP and dental surgeries are at/beyond capacity, with the latter 2 generally failing its users.
The proposed access to the development; via The Street, Gillingham, is inadequate for the exisitng amount of road users.
Further development will exacerbate the above mentioned issues.
Alternative access route should be provided.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 2737
Received: 05/03/2023
Respondent: Mrs Emma Elliot
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The Street has a blind bend, made more dangerous by the parking of cars and vans too far round the corner. Residents from Geldeston and Gillingham, plus school traffic, have daily issues getting through the village. The village is brought to a standstill every time the A146 is closed making it very difficult for residents to reach/leave their properties. The recent development has resulted in cars being parked on the road/pavement putting pedestrians at risk. Daily speeding issues.
The bend on the Street cannot cope with additional traffic developments in Gillingham and Geldeston would bring, confirmed by the Highways Agency.
There are no changes that could be made to this plan which would make it acceptable to, or safer for, the residents of Gillingham.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 2798
Received: 06/03/2023
Respondent: Ms Jane Black
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Because of the layout of the village all traffic for any new development has to go along the street and negotiate the blind bend. Residents have to park along this road as there is no viable alternative and the road is already hazardous during busy times with traffic coming from both directions. Any new development will greatly increase the potential for accidents. This problem was confirmed in a report from the Highways Agency within its response to a planning application in 2022/1993
Separate access to the village needs to be provided.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 2823
Received: 06/03/2023
Respondent: Mr Ian Thurbon
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The Street is currently too busy to sustain more traffic. The blind bends that lead to single carriage way traffic, due to on street parking, is often a place where cars meet head on. Often they can not reverse as there are either cars behind them or they are reversing around a blind bend into oncoming traffic. This leads to cars mounting the pavement, which leads to the primary school, causing a danger to pedestrians. This street is also bus route and so this exacerbates the problem.
The plans need to amended or rejected unless a reduction to existing traffic levels is incorporated into the plans. Therefore I object the these plans.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 2867
Received: 07/03/2023
Respondent: Mr Nick Goodge
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The housing expansion plans for Gillingham and Geldeston rely on the existing infrastructure to be able to cope with the new demand. The existing ninety degree bend on "The Street" is the fundamental flaw with any expansion and will eventually lead to a fatal accident i.m.o. I have personally come face to face with delivery driver vans on the wrong side of the road that were obviously unaware of the danger of that bend. This danger will only get worse as more cars use it due to more houses and more delivery drivers due to the way we shop.
The dangerous bend is unavoidable and unchangeable - if any new houses are built in the area then the access needs to be via the A146 or A143 via newly constructed roundabouts. A new roundabout in between the Heart services and Stockton roundabouts will all help to slow down the traffic that meets the Heart services at far to high speeds where we have already seen many accidents since the services has been expanded.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 2920
Received: 07/03/2023
Respondent: Ms Julia Johnson
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Gillingham is a village of approximately 250 houses separated into two parts. The road which connects the two parts (The Street) is narrow and has two 90 degree bends and extensive car parking which blocks the road, rendering it to be one way only. These concerns are acknowledged in the NCC Highways response to planning application 2022/1993 which is an outline application for this exact site and which notes that mitigation will be required as it cannot cope with the proposed additional traffic levels.
Remove this site from the plan as there are others which have less constraints and better meet the over-arching planning guidance. For example, in your Sustainability Appraisal Report on page 79 and 80 it can be seen that the Stockton site SN0091 has far better RAG status than this site in Gillingham (as per attached extract). Many other sites in the wider list also better meet the criteria listed.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 3003
Received: 08/03/2023
Respondent: Mrs Susan Oglesby
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The Street currently is very busy, difficult to negotiate and dangerous for pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles.
Planning decisions need to take this problem into account when considering further development.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 3029
Received: 08/03/2023
Respondent: Mrs Elizabeth Wilson
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Travel through Gillingham is already an issue as, due to the parking, The Street is virtually a single carriageway with a blind bend and there is so much traffic trying to negotiate it any additional traffic just adds to the problem. Whenever there is an issue on the surrounding main roads traffic diverts through the village and gridlock often ensues. More housing in Gillingham or Geldeston - and therefore more vehicles - will only exacerbate this problem.
There must be no new roadways coming out on to The Street.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 3037
Received: 08/03/2023
Respondent: Mr Paul Thurbon
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Within Gillingham there is a blind bend which is very dangerous with cars parked on 1 side too. This is the only way into or out of Gillingham. An increase in traffic (caused by extra cars/houses). The Highways agency have also noted this.
The area is in flood risk zone 3, as confirmed by the environment agency and therefore should only be built on in very extreme circumstances (when all other possibilities have been explored.
Development of this site would harm views out of the 2 main parts of the village into open countryside.
A new road of the A146 needs to be built to supply the new houses and support with the rest of traffic in Gillingham.
Flood risk zone 3 land should only be used a last resort. I do not believe all the other possibilities in south Norfolk have been explored and exhausted yet to warrant considering this one.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Representation ID: 3055
Received: 08/03/2023
Respondent: Lorraine Greenwood
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Had our quota of houses.
Road is dangerous
Site in a flood zone that likely be worse due to global warming and extra urbanisation from new houses
/Increase in commercial site
Do not build. Use infill sites