QUESTION 11a: Do you agree with the proposed increase in density on allocation VC SWA2, Land on Main Road, Swardeston, to accommodate approximately 40 dwellings? Please explain your response.

Object

Representation ID: 3286

Received: 24/12/2023

Respondent: Mr Derek Barber

Swardeston has insufficient facilities and infrastructure to support the original planned 30 dwellings so this should not be increased. The claim that "neighbouring Mulbarton" has easily accessible facilities ignores the fact that Mulbarton is not accessible by pedestrians or cyclists due to the extremely dangerous nature of the road and footpath. Building more houses that necessitate using a car to access anything cannot be allowed in the present climate.

Comment

Representation ID: 3401

Received: 24/01/2024

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Historic Environment

Amber - archaeological mitigation will probably be necessary but is unlikely to prevent development. There is already a planning application on this site.

Comment

Representation ID: 3414

Received: 24/01/2024

Respondent: Norfolk County Council

The Highway Authority does not object to the revised allocation.

Comment

Representation ID: 3457

Received: 24/01/2024

Respondent: Norfolk County Council Childrens Services

Catchment numbers in decline closest school has capacity for 2FE, with some capacity to expand if needed.

Comment

Representation ID: 3544

Received: 31/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

No comments.

Comment

Representation ID: 3595

Received: 01/02/2024

Respondent: Anglian Water Services

An increase to 40 dwellings from 30 dwellings proposed at Reg.19. Anglian Water has no objection to the increase in housing numbers on this site.