QUESTION 149: Do you support

Comment

Representation ID: 871

Received: 29/07/2021

Respondent: Mr Stuart Offord

1 This site appears the most suitable option of those listed in that it lies within the heart of the village and would provide an infill of linear development adjacent existing housing.
2 It is important that suitable provision is made to deal with local infrastructure and environmental issues; particularly surface water and foul water drainage disposal.
3 The development requires a high standard of design, of suitable scale and form, in keeping with the South Norfolk rural village setting.
4 The use of sustainable, sympathetic construction materials is essential.
5 Affordable social housing should be included if possible.

Support

Representation ID: 1086

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Ms Sharon Wright

I support site SN0414 and consider this an ideal location for housing in Haddiscoe. The site is within walking distance to the village hall, play park and school. Conveniently located on the A143 gives easy access to all amenities in Beccles, Loddon and the city of Norwich.

Support

Representation ID: 1088

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Mr Tony Watson

SN0414 Support this site in Haddiscoe and believe this will provide a good addition to the village. The location is within the natural village boundary and has direct access to the A143.

Object

Representation ID: 1145

Received: 01/08/2021

Respondent: Mr RAY Long

The proposed lands southern boundary will spoil my view from the rear of my property. Also access to these properties is from where?? The main Road is certainly not a safe turning point. Possibly turning in from the rear of my property?
Regards sewerage and rain fall collected by new properties this will then drain to Low Road and onto Broadland marshes.
Fewer houses set back would be acceptable but can i be assured that no further development would be allowed on this land??

Support

Representation ID: 1148

Received: 01/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Paul Watson

Support SN0414. I’ve lived in Haddiscoe for most of my life and seen many young people forced to move away from their family homes due to the lack of available housing in the village and feel that Haddiscoe will greatly benefit from new housing to boost the village and the local area. The site is perfectly situated within the village.

Support

Representation ID: 1563

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Durrants

We support the preferred site SN0414 (Part) and agree that this site should be considered suitable for allocation. Satisfactory access could be reasonably achieved and mitigation measures could be incorporated into the layout and design of the site to mitigate and potential landscape and heritage issues raised.

Comment

Representation ID: 1902

Received: 22/07/2021

Respondent: South Norfolk Council

The Environmental Protection Team are not aware of any significant land quality issue with this site or adjacent land. However, having regard to the size of the site and sensitivity of the proposed development it is considered that a Phase One Land Contamination Report (Desk Study) should be required as part of any planning application.

Comment

Representation ID: 1986

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Water Management Alliance

See attachment for full response.
(Part of) SN0414, Land south of Beccles Road, Haddiscoe
Outside the IDD boundary, within the Waveney, Lower Yare and Lothingland IDB watershed catchment.
Major development – A series of riparian watercourse are located to the south of the proposed site. If surface water discharges within the watershed catchment of the Board's IDD, we request that this discharge is facilitated in line with the Non-statutory technical standards for sustainable drainage systems (SuDS).

Comment

Representation ID: 2059

Received: 21/07/2021

Respondent: Historic England

Please see attachments for full response.
Site: (Part of) SN0414, Land south of Beccles Road, Haddiscoe
Whilst there are no designated heritage assets on site, the grade I listed St Marys Church, together with a War Memorial and monument to William Salter, both of which are listed at grade II, lie to the west of the site. Therefore, any development of this site has the potential to impact upon the significance of these heritage assets through development within the setting of the assets.
A heritage impact assessment of the site should be undertaken to assess the impact of the proposed development on the listed buildings and determine if allocation of this site is appropriate, and if it is what mitigation may be required. The findings of the HIA should inform whether the site is allocated and if it is, the policy criterion including any mitigation and enhancement.
Complete an HIA to inform the allocation of the site including any mitigation, enhancement and policy wording.

Comment

Representation ID: 2108

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA

See attachments for full response.
Few or no constraints. Standard information required at a planning stage.
"1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: No
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): No
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: No
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of SAND AND GRAVEL. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised." The LLFA have unconfirmed records of flooding within ~500.00m of the site boundary.
Assessment: Green

Comment

Representation ID: 2170

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Minerals and Waste Team

The Mineral Planning Authority is pleased to note the inclusion within the site assessments of its previous comments on the potential allocation sites regarding mineral resource safeguarding. Currently, the reasoned justification for the sites does not include reference to mineral resource safeguarding. We would like to reiterate from our previous comments that the need for mineral resource safeguarding to be addressed needs to be included within the requirements of the respective site’s allocation policy.

The Site assessments for SN0414 and SN0392, both at Haddiscoe do not contain reference to the proposed mineral extraction site MIN 25 at Haddiscoe, which was mentioned in our previous response. The site assessments should be revised to contain this information.

There are existing residential properties at least as close to the potential mineral site allocation MIN 25 as the proposed housing locations. In accordance with the site assessment for MIN 25, the draft site allocation policy includes a requirement for suitable mitigation measures to be included in a future planning application, to ensure that there would be no unacceptable amenity impacts for these properties from the operation of the mineral extraction site.

Comment

Representation ID: 2231

Received: 28/09/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Senior Ecologist

Green no major ecological constraints identified from desk-top search. Surveys, and biodiversity enhancement in accordance with policy required.
Agricultural field to south of A143 - defunct hedge along road. Adjacent to candidate county geodiversity site (to the south east), and adjacent to priority habitats (deciduous woodland) (see MAGIC). Site within amber habitat zones for great crested newts. Site in SSSI IRZ, but residential development doesn't trigger consultation with Natural England. Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy, should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain.