QUESTION 151: Do you support

Support

Representation ID: 1562

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Durrants

We support the proposed extension of the settlement limit for site SN4015SL. Satisfactory access could be reasonably achieved and would allow for a continuation of the linear pattern of development.

Support

Representation ID: 1735

Received: 26/07/2021

Respondent: Wheatacre Parish Council

Councillors and residents supported the development of this site.

Comment

Representation ID: 1904

Received: 22/07/2021

Respondent: South Norfolk Council

The Environmental Protection Team are not aware of any significant land quality issue with this site or adjacent land. However, having regard to the size of the site and sensitivity of the proposed development it is recomended that a Phase One Land Contamination Report (Desk Study) should be required as part of any planning application.

I would offer the following comments in respect of question 152 to Chapter 43 of the VCHAP relating to the Rejected Sites in Toft Monks, Aldeby, Haddiscoe, Wheatacre and Burgh St Peter in the event that one or more of them be allocated instead of, or in addition to, the preferred sites as a result of the consultation process.

Comment

Representation ID: 1988

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Water Management Alliance

See attachment for full response.
SN4015SL – Land west of Mill Road, Burgh St Peter
Outside the IDD boundary, within the Waveney, Lower Yare and Lothingland IDB watershed catchment.
Minor development – no further comments.

Comment

Representation ID: 2139

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA

SN4015SL
See attachment for full comments
Few or no constraints. Standard information required at a planning stage. "1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: Yes
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: Minor flooding
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: 0.00 - 0.60cm.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): No
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: No
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of SAND AND GRAVEL. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."

Assessment: Green

Comment

Representation ID: 2233

Received: 28/09/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Senior Ecologist

Green no major ecological constraints identified from desk-top search. Surveys, and biodiversity enhancement in accordance with policy required.
Part of agricultural field adjacent to dwelling, on Mill Road. - no priority habitats onsite (see MAGIC). Site within amber habitat zones for great crested newts. Site in SSSI IRZ, but residential development doesn't trigger consultation with Natural England (unless 50 units of more). Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy, should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain.