South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Comment

Representation ID: 671

Received: 27/07/2021

Respondent: Pulham Market Parish Council

Pulham Market Parish Council support the extent of the Settlement Limit as shown but would not support any further extension to the southern boundary towards Guildhall Lane alongside the new gardens of Copperfield Court.
Council consider that extending the Settlement Limit further would have an unacceptable and detrimental impact on the landscape and might encourage an application for access to Guildhall Lane, currently an unclassified road and totally unsuitable for this purpose.

Support

Representation ID: 673

Received: 27/07/2021

Respondent: Pulham Market Parish Council

Pulham Market Parish Council support the preferred site SN1024. If this site is allocated Council request that the boundary is not extended into the land south towards Guild Hall Lane. Council consider that would have an unacceptable impact on the landscape and might encourage an application for access to Guild Hall Lane, currently an unclassified road and totally unsuitable for this purpose.

Comment

Representation ID: 674

Received: 27/07/2021

Respondent: Pulham Market Parish Council

Pulham Market Parish Council do not think that any of the shortlisted or rejected sites should be allocated instead of, or in addition to, the preferred site. The Council are happy to support the preferred site SN1024 as they believe it best supports the ongoing requirement of housing needs within Pulham Market.

Object

Representation ID: 675

Received: 27/07/2021

Respondent: Pulham Market Parish Council

Pulham Market Parish think that shortlisted site SN0418 should be rejected because of the concerns raised by Highways about the potential to form an acceptable access and the unsuitability of the local highway network.