South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
Search representations
Results for Norfolk County Council - Minerals and Waste Team search
New searchComment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 52: Do you support
Representation ID: 2169
Received: 14/07/2021
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Minerals and Waste Team
Currently, the reasoned justification for the sites does not include reference to mineral resource safeguarding. We would like to reiterate from our previous comments that the need for mineral resource safeguarding to be addressed needs to be included within the requirements of the respective site’s allocation policy.
SN0218-Land West of Earsham: our previous response highlighted that this site was within 250m of both an active mineral extraction site, and a proposed mineral extraction allocation in the Minerals and Waste Local Plan Review. These areas were also the subject of a planning application for mineral extraction. On 9 November 2020, application FUL/2019/0062 was approved for mineral extraction on three areas off Hall Road & Pheasants Walk, to the north of the A146. It is expected that the permission will be implemented in Autumn 2021. The site assessment and reasoned justification should be amended to include reference to the permitted mineral extraction areas to the north.
For this site which we have identified as being within the Consultation Area of the permitted mineral extraction facilities, the final assessment of whether the proposed housing allocations would have any impact on the mineral extraction operations is dependent on details which would be contained within any future planning application.
The location of the potential Earsham housing allocation is separated from the permitted mineral extraction sites by the A143, and landscaping and screening measures on the mineral site. Therefore, in principle, it is unlikely that there would be unacceptable amenity impacts compared with the background situation. However, in order to confirm this, consultation with the Mineral Planning Authority should take place as part of the planning application process, once the details of layout are known, as detailed in Mineral and Waste Core Strategy Policy CS16. This need for consultation should be contained in the site allocation policy.
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 149: Do you support
Representation ID: 2170
Received: 14/07/2021
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Minerals and Waste Team
The Mineral Planning Authority is pleased to note the inclusion within the site assessments of its previous comments on the potential allocation sites regarding mineral resource safeguarding. Currently, the reasoned justification for the sites does not include reference to mineral resource safeguarding. We would like to reiterate from our previous comments that the need for mineral resource safeguarding to be addressed needs to be included within the requirements of the respective site’s allocation policy.
The Site assessments for SN0414 and SN0392, both at Haddiscoe do not contain reference to the proposed mineral extraction site MIN 25 at Haddiscoe, which was mentioned in our previous response. The site assessments should be revised to contain this information.
There are existing residential properties at least as close to the potential mineral site allocation MIN 25 as the proposed housing locations. In accordance with the site assessment for MIN 25, the draft site allocation policy includes a requirement for suitable mitigation measures to be included in a future planning application, to ensure that there would be no unacceptable amenity impacts for these properties from the operation of the mineral extraction site.
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 152: Do you think
Representation ID: 2171
Received: 14/07/2021
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Minerals and Waste Team
The Mineral Planning Authority is pleased to note the inclusion within the site assessments of its previous comments on the potential allocation sites regarding mineral resource safeguarding. Currently, the reasoned justification for the sites does not include reference to mineral resource safeguarding. We would like to reiterate from our previous comments that the need for mineral resource safeguarding to be addressed needs to be included within the requirements of the respective site’s allocation policy.
The Site assessments for SN0414 and SN0392, both at Haddiscoe do not contain reference to the proposed mineral extraction site MIN 25 at Haddiscoe, which was mentioned in our previous response. The site assessments should be revised to contain this information.
There are existing residential properties at least as close to the potential mineral site allocation MIN 25 as the proposed housing locations. In accordance with the site assessment for MIN 25, the draft site allocation policy includes a requirement for suitable mitigation measures to be included in a future planning application, to ensure that there would be no unacceptable amenity impacts for these properties from the operation of the mineral extraction site.
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 125: Do you think
Representation ID: 2172
Received: 14/07/2021
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Minerals and Waste Team
The Mineral Planning Authority is pleased to note the inclusion within the site assessments of its previous comments on the potential allocation sites regarding mineral resource safeguarding. Currently, the reasoned justification for the sites does not include reference to mineral resource safeguarding. We would like to reiterate from our previous comments that the need for mineral resource safeguarding to be addressed needs to be included within the requirements of the respective site’s allocation policy.
The Site assessment for SN0532, at Caistor St. Edmund does not contain reference to the active mineral extraction site within 250m which was mentioned in our previous response. The site assessment should be revised to contain this information.
There are existing residential properties nearer to the active mineral extraction site than the proposed housing location. The active mineral operation has not given rise to complaints from these existing residential properties, regarding amenity impacts from its existing operation and therefore is not expected to cause unacceptable amenity impacts for the proposed housing location.