South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Comment

Representation ID: 746

Received: 28/07/2021

Respondent: Durrants

On behalf of the landowner of SN0363SL, we do not agree with the rejection of the site. It is not agreed that access is problematic, with two established access' off Station Rd, which facilitate properties of the Maltings and other housing with on site car parking.

Two dwellings north of the site were constructed as recently opposite the Maltings, with no mention of a detrimental impact on the Maltings or townscape. It is difficult to understand how a development in close proximity could now have a detrimental impact. We ask the LPA to consider their stance on this site submission.

Comment

Representation ID: 1540

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Durrants

Heritage impact can be mitigated by sensitive design, the surrounding area is already built up with a range of modern properties.
There is no rural impact as the surrounding area is already built up.
Highways issues can be resolved through allocation of a short length of footpath which will benefit the other properties in the area connecting them with the village centre.

Support

Representation ID: 1557

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Durrants

We support the preferred site SN1052REV and agree that this site should be considered suitable for allocation. site is considered suitable for allocation. The site is well related to the existing settlement and the services and facilities within it.

Support

Representation ID: 1559

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Durrants

We support the preferred site SN0567 and agree that this site should be considered suitable for allocation. The site has a good relationship with the existing settlement and a linear form of development along the frontage of the site would complement the existing pattern of development.

Support

Representation ID: 1561

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Durrants

We support the preferred site SN4017 and agree that this site should be considered suitable for allocation.
the site is relatively well contained within the existing pattern of development within the settlement. Drainage and footpath issues raised can be reasonably mitigated.

Support

Representation ID: 1562

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Durrants

We support the proposed extension of the settlement limit for site SN4015SL. Satisfactory access could be reasonably achieved and would allow for a continuation of the linear pattern of development.

Support

Representation ID: 1563

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Durrants

We support the preferred site SN0414 (Part) and agree that this site should be considered suitable for allocation. Satisfactory access could be reasonably achieved and mitigation measures could be incorporated into the layout and design of the site to mitigate and potential landscape and heritage issues raised.

Support

Representation ID: 1566

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Durrants

We support the preferred site SN3019 and agree that this site should be considered suitable for allocation or a settlement limit extension. The site is well related and connected to the centre of the settlement where there is an existing footpath provision. We would expect any footpath or surface water drainage issues to be reasonably mitigated.

Comment

Representation ID: 1591

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Durrants

Broome - Land west of Old Yarmouth Road, Broome Site SN4020
We believe the site SN4020 should be considered as a preferred site or a settlement limit extension as it continues the linear development of the settlement following from the previously allocated BRO1 site.

Comment

Representation ID: 1592

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Durrants

Tivetshall St Margaret – SN2103, Land North of School Road
We believe the site SN2103 should be considered as a preferred site or a settlement limit extension as it is better positioned within the overall settlement of the village for development compared to site SN0318/SN0319. Site SN2103 is located close to the school, village hall and other facilities and is well related to the existing settlement. Landscape mitigation can be put in place to the east.