South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
Search representations
Results for Resident search
New searchObject
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 58: Do you support
Representation ID: 606
Received: 24/07/2021
Respondent: Resident
Potential 120 extra vehicles using The Street is unreasonable, very congested narrow road with blind bends and residential onroad parking,
also bus route, school collection etc and rat run from surrounding villages into Beccles.
Solution double yellow lines and create large residents parking area on field. rear access to school also through site.
Properties flooded in Dec 2020, water poured off fields into homes. Flood category 3 area, recently moved to property and searches stated area 3.
Not opposed to development although school and infrastructure would need improving greatly to cope with these extra properties.
.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 59: Do you think
Representation ID: 607
Received: 24/07/2021
Respondent: Resident
Please see my comments for question 58, these objections are the same for question 59.
If access to the development could be gained from McDonalds roundabout the traffic/congestion problems surrounding The Street would be avoided.
A buffer greenbelt could also be created between any homes potentially affected by the development and the new site.
Gillingham school would need to be expanded to cope with the extra pupils and associated parent parking.