South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Comment

Representation ID: 809

Received: 29/07/2021

Respondent: JCPC Ltd

Broadly agree, but SNVC Objective 1 should be fully consistent with Policy 7.5 of the GNLP

Support

Representation ID: 810

Received: 29/07/2021

Respondent: JCPC Ltd

Agree with ‘standard requirements’ and the criteria set out

Support

Representation ID: 811

Received: 29/07/2021

Respondent: JCPC Ltd

Agree, criteria are appropriate, subject to the phraseology being linked to the emphasis placed on good design in the National Planning Policy Framework (2021).

Comment

Representation ID: 812

Received: 29/07/2021

Respondent: JCPC Ltd

Agree, although additional criteria could suggest that ‘in determining the appropriate mix and type of housing regard will also be had to the character and form of existing housing in the locality of the site’.

Support

Representation ID: 813

Received: 29/07/2021

Respondent: JCPC Ltd

Agreed

Object

Representation ID: 818

Received: 29/07/2021

Respondent: JCPC Ltd

Objection is raised on the basis that SN2036 is unsuitable to accommodate more than the existing allocation of five dwellings on the basis of the material planning harm that would arise from a doubling of the extent of development.

Comment

Representation ID: 820

Received: 29/07/2021

Respondent: JCPC Ltd

It is considered that an additional site (SN4036A) should be allocated for residential development as it would deliver six dwellings in a logical and compatible form to existing development, would be fully compliant with technical requirements, would not result in any material planning harm, and would potentially secure other community benefits

Support

Representation ID: 821

Received: 29/07/2021

Respondent: JCPC Ltd

Agreed