South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
Search representations
Results for Glavenhill Limited search
New searchSupport
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 129: Do you support
Representation ID: 1435
Received: 02/08/2021
Respondent: Glavenhill Limited
Agent: Lanpro Services Ltd
The enclosed letter documents Glavenhill’s support for the proposed allocation, confirming the suitability, availability and deliverability of the site for small scale residential development.
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 1: Do you agree
Representation ID: 1450
Received: 02/08/2021
Respondent: Glavenhill Limited
Agent: Lanpro Services Ltd
Although Glavenhill offers support to the concept of village clusters, agreeing that there is a need to allocate new housing in accessible, rural locations to help support sustainable patterns of growth, they cannot support the significant emphasis that is placed upon rural village clusters (outside of the old Norwich Policy Area (NPA)). An alternative strategy is suggested within these representations.
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 2: Do you agree
Representation ID: 1452
Received: 02/08/2021
Respondent: Glavenhill Limited
Agent: Lanpro Services Ltd
The principle of having ‘standard requirements’ is a sensible approach and avoids repetition within the site specific policies of the draft plan. However, in this instance Glavenhill consider them unnecessary and in the case of some of the requirements, inappropriate. Glavenhill suggest that Policy SNVC1 be deleted and any specific requirements be included within the policy wording of individual allocations.
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 3: Do you agree
Representation ID: 1453
Received: 02/08/2021
Respondent: Glavenhill Limited
Agent: Lanpro Services Ltd
It is Glavenhill’s view that a policy on ‘design’ is not required. Question 3 highlights the local design documents that are already in place to ensure the high-quality design of developments and as such, any design policy would be considered duplication. It is respectively requested that the draft plan be amended to refer developers / applicants to the relevant design guidance.
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 4: Do you agree
Representation ID: 1454
Received: 02/08/2021
Respondent: Glavenhill Limited
Agent: Lanpro Services Ltd
It is Glavenhill’s view that a ‘housing mix’ policy is unnecessary as it duplicates other documents and policies. Glavenhill respectfully request that this section of the document be amended to refer developers / applicant to the relevant housing needs assessments and GNLP policies which establish housing mix.
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 123: Do you agree
Representation ID: 1518
Received: 02/08/2021
Respondent: Glavenhill Limited
Agent: Lanpro Services Ltd
Please see attachments for full response.
We seek an extension to the existing settlement limit of the village to include an additional 0.7ha of land along Norwich Road. The site forms part of SN2091 which has been rejected within the current VCHAP.
Due to site’s accessibility and capacity of settlement to accommodate growth, these representations address the Council’s concerns on SN2091 and promote a much-reduced area of land to the West of Norwich Road for residential development.
We wish the reduced site to be included within a minor extension to the existing settlement limit as opposed to previously suggested site-specific allocation. Also proposed that remainder of the SN2091 and wider land ownership be safeguarded/designated for new publicly accessible habitat improvement area.
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 125: Do you think
Representation ID: 1521
Received: 02/08/2021
Respondent: Glavenhill Limited
Agent: Lanpro Services Ltd
Please see attachments for full response.
We seek an extension to the existing settlement limit of the village to include an additional 0.7ha of land along Norwich Road. The site forms part of SN2091 which has been rejected within the current VCHAP.
Due to site’s accessibility and capacity of settlement to accommodate growth, these representations address the Council’s concerns on SN2091 and promote a much-reduced area of land to the West of Norwich Road for residential development.
We wish the reduced site to be included within a minor extension to the existing settlement limit as opposed to previously suggested site-specific allocation. Also proposed that remainder of the SN2091 and wider land ownership be safeguarded/designated for new publicly accessible habitat improvement area.