South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

Search representations

Results for Mr. search

New search New search

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

QUESTION 7: Do you agree

Representation ID: 1605

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Mr.

Representation Summary:

The Parish is not able to take additional development aside from infill plots and the development boundary should not be increased. The public transport is extremely limited and the roads are single track in every direction in the approach to the villages.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

QUESTION 8: Do you support

Representation ID: 1611

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Mr.

Representation Summary:

This site is wholly unsuitable for development as proposed. The access is via existing narrow estate road which is regularly congested and restricted by residents and visitor parking in the road. Additional traffic will compound the issue and could easily cause accidents. The land is currently used as meadow, supporting a large amount of wildlife and natural habitat that could never be replaced once lost. It is contrary to common sense and scientific advice to excavate green field sites in support of development, especially when pursuing the Nett Zero Carbon policy as proposed by the UK Government

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

QUESTION 9: Do you support

Representation ID: 1617

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Mr.

Representation Summary:

This site is grossly unsuitable for development as it would remove valuable farmland and destroy habitat for wildlife and flora. The road is narrow and it would negatively impact the village and setting of the rural nature of the road. Using greenfield land for new housing is unnecessary when brownfield sites are available.

Comment

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)

QUESTION 10: Do you support

Representation ID: 1620

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Mr.

Representation Summary:

If there has to be development, then let brownfield sites should be the absolute priority.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.