South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
Search representations
Results for Norfolk County Council - LLFA search
New searchComment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 93: Do you support
Representation ID: 2147
Received: 14/07/2021
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA
SN2065REV
See attachment for full comments
Few or no constraints.
Standard information required at a planning stage.
"1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: No
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): No
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): Yes|Ordinary Watercourse
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: No
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of SAND AND GRAVEL. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised." The site is adjacent to a flow path. This must be considered in the site assessment.
Assessment: Green
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 107: Do you support
Representation ID: 2148
Received: 14/07/2021
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA
SN2064REV
See attachment for full comments
Few or no constraints.
Standard information required at a planning stage. "1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: No
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): Yes - Internal Flooding|Yes - External Flooding
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: Source Protection Zone 3
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of DIAMICTON. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."
Only the northwest corner of the site is within a SPZ 3.
Assessment: Green
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 89: Do you support
Representation ID: 2149
Received: 14/07/2021
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA
SN2038
See attachment for full comments
Few or no constraints.
Standard information required at a planning stage. "1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: No
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): Yes - Internal Flooding|Yes - External Flooding
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: Yes
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): Yes
5.] Source Protection Zone?: Source Protection Zone 3
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of DIAMICTON. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."
Assessment: Green
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 92: Do you support
Representation ID: 2151
Received: 14/07/2021
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA
SN2036
See attachment for full comments
Few or no constraints.
Standard information required at a planning stage. "1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: No
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): No
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: No
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: Waveney Valley
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of CLAY, SILT, SAND AND GRAVEL. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."
The site is adjacent to a flow path. This must be considered in the site assessment.
Assessment: Green
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 48: Do you support
Representation ID: 2152
Received: 14/07/2021
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA
SN2011SL
Few or no constraints.
Standard information required at a planning stage. "1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: No
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): Yes - Internal Flooding|Yes - External Flooding
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: Source Protection Zone 3
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of SAND AND GRAVEL. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."
See attachment for full comments
Assessment: Green
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 106: Do you support
Representation ID: 2154
Received: 14/07/2021
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA
SN2007 & SN0531
See attachment for full comments
Few or no constraints. Standard information required at a planning stage. "1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: No
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): Yes - Internal Flooding|Yes - External Flooding
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: No
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of DIAMICTON. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."
Assessment: Green
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 129: Do you support
Representation ID: 2156
Received: 14/07/2021
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA
SN1057
See attachment for full comments
Few or no constraints. Standard information required at a planning stage. "1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: No
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): No
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): Yes
5.] Source Protection Zone?: No
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of DIAMICTON. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."
Assessment: Green
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 1: Do you agree
Representation ID: 2157
Received: 14/07/2021
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA
At present, there is no mention of flood risk within the SNVC Objectives. While in the SNVC Core Policies, there is only a passing mention of the need for a flood risk assessment as a standard requirement. We understand the VCHAP is to be a self- standing document that is separate from GNLP and yet the proposed policies given within VCHAP are proposing to use policies from both in the GNLP, the South Norfolk Development Management Policies and the Neighbourhood Plans.
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 2: Do you agree
Representation ID: 2158
Received: 14/07/2021
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA
The Policy SNVC1 - Standard Requirements confirms the need to acknowledge the existing and typical requirements for developments, however at present the current policy is limited in its provision and even indicates that specifics requirements are potentially optional. With this in mind, we question whether appropriate consideration to supporting policies (such as Flood Risk and Water Management policies) have been given due consideration and representation by the proposed VCHAP.
The Greater Norwich Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Level 2 has not considered the effects of the VCHAP sites within the assessment or it’s Cumulative Impact Assessment relating to flood risk. As the VCHAP considers the allocation of approximately 1200 homes, an appropriate level of consideration to the strategic flood risk would be reasonable to be consider both within the plan and its supporting evidence base. At present this consideration has not been observed.
Given the recent flooding events in South Norfolk during August 2020 and Christmas 2020, better consideration of flood risk and its management should be included in the housing allocation process and the supporting documentation (such as the Level 2 GNSFRA) should be adjusted to reflect the proposed VCHAP.
The LLFA would request that the VCHAP policies requires that any future development (or re-development) proposals show there is no increased risk of flooding from an existing flood source and mitigation measures are implemented to address surface water arising within the development site.
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
QUESTION 3: Do you agree
Representation ID: 2159
Received: 14/07/2021
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA
In Policy SNVC2 – Design, we request that the any development application made will be required to demonstrate that it would need to be consistent with the Norfolk LLFA Developer Guidance, the Local Flood Risk Management Strategy and national policies on the management of flood risk.