South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Object

Representation ID: 2302

Received: 09/02/2023

Respondent: Tivetshall St Margaret & Tivetshall St Mary Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

My worry is that the extra cars will create a problem as all the local services are at the far end of the village. Walkers will also be hindered by this. We would request a footpath to be included.

Object

Representation ID: 2303

Received: 09/02/2023

Respondent: Tivetshall St Margaret & Tivetshall St Mary Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

My worry is the extra cars coming onto the street with no footpaths planned

Object

Representation ID: 2304

Received: 09/02/2023

Respondent: Tivetshall St Margaret & Tivetshall St Mary Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

It does seem a lot at first but we would not accept more. The dwellings would suffer from a lack of car parking and would need good footpaths around the development

Object

Representation ID: 2567

Received: 01/03/2023

Respondent: Tivetshall St Margaret & Tivetshall St Mary Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Please note: the following representation is being made by the Parish Council on behalf of a local resident

Its too many houses for the site
It could overlook properties that could impact local parishioners
A lack on amenities and local footpaths along the street
Is not in linear keeping with the look of the village
Impact the local environment and wildlife in the area
The worry on the impact access to the building of the plot and the lack of good access
The lack of a defined bus service that is over 2 miles form the proposed site
The proposed dwelling would impact on the reasons why we moved to the village

Object

Representation ID: 2568

Received: 01/03/2023

Respondent: Tivetshall St Margaret & Tivetshall St Mary Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Please note: the following representation is being made by the Parish Council on behalf of a local resident

I hope that Houses are not built that overlook my property just bungalows or single story homes
I think its the wrong site and not appropriate for dwellings to be built there
Access to and from the site in not reasonable and very dangerous and its not suitable
lack of amenities and paths make the site unsuitable totally
The issue with the environment and local wildlife habitat being destroyed is a worry

Object

Representation ID: 2569

Received: 01/03/2023

Respondent: Tivetshall St Margaret & Tivetshall St Mary Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Please note: the following representation is being made by the Parish Council on behalf of a local resident

I do not want the dwellings built due to the site not being suitable
I worry about the access and exit to to the site
I worry about the local habitat and environment losing this valuable site
I worry that our dwelling will be overlooked by others
No footpaths and speeding is an issue when walking in the village

Object

Representation ID: 2570

Received: 01/03/2023

Respondent: Tivetshall St Margaret & Tivetshall St Mary Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Please note: the following representation is being made by the Parish Council on behalf of a local resident

I think the site is totally wrong
I think it will impacts on the local wildlife
I worry about the dwellings overlooking other properties
I worry the site will have limited access and exit causing traffic issues
We have no amenities in the village such as a shop or pub and the nearest bus service is a 2 mile walk not as you suggest ion your policy

Object

Representation ID: 2974

Received: 08/03/2023

Respondent: Tivetshall St Margaret & Tivetshall St Mary Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Form & character: should be noted that there is large playing field with play equipment next to village hall. Also village pond upgrade in 2023.
Settlement limit: the changes will have immediate effect on linear style of village. Preference of the Neighbourhood Plan team was 3 smaller sites, rather than one larger site proposed by VCHAP. PC disappointed that NCC Environment Officer did not recommend any of village trees to be suitable for Preservation Orders.
Site allocations: no through village bus service. Bus stops on A140, more than mile from proposed site.
Village linear characteristic: proposed development will result in all properties on south of Mill Rd and 10 bungalows to west of The Street losing their only open view of countryside. Linear characteristic of village should be retained, in line with adopted NP.
Partial site development: serious concern that development of half original proposed site will in future lead to phase 2, which would pose major roadway safety issues.
Neighbourhood Plan Tiv 1: this proposal is not in conformity with policy Tiv1 of the NP (in terms of respecting the form, character and setting of the established pattern of development. The proposal also contradicts NP as regards privacy and open views.