South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Search representations

Results for CPRE Norfolk search

New search New search

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

A.1.

Representation ID: 2322

Received: 14/02/2023

Respondent: CPRE Norfolk

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The SNVCHAP should not be running on a different timetable to the GNLP. The housing numbers are unnecessarily high and unsound, in part due to housing within the SNVCHAP being located in more unsustainable locations which will affect the ability of the GNLP authorities to meet Climate Change targets.

Change suggested by respondent:

To address these issues and to make the two plans sound they should run to the same timetable. As outlined above the inclusion of unnecessary housing numbers within the SNVCHAP in unsustainable locations also makes the SNVCHAP unsound and therefore it should not be adopted.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

A.8.

Representation ID: 2323

Received: 14/02/2023

Respondent: CPRE Norfolk

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The SNVCHAP should not be running on a different timetable to the GNLP. The housing numbers are unnecessarily high and unsound, in part due to housing within the SNVCHAP being located in more unsustainable locations which will affect the ability of the GNLP authorities to meet Climate Change targets.

Change suggested by respondent:

To address these issues and to make the two plans sound they should run to the same timetable. As outlined above the inclusion of unnecessary housing numbers within the SNVCHAP in unsustainable locations also makes the SNVCHAP unsound and should therefore not be adopted.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

A.17. The Regulation 19

Representation ID: 2324

Received: 14/02/2023

Respondent: CPRE Norfolk

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The SNVCHAP should not be running on a different timetable to the GNLP. The housing numbers are unnecessarily high and unsound, in part due to housing within the SNVCHAP being located in more unsustainable locations which will affect the ability of the GNLP authorities to meet Climate Change targets.

Change suggested by respondent:

To address these issues and to make the two plans sound they should run to the same timetable. As outlined above the inclusion of unnecessary housing numbers within the SNVCHAP in unsustainable locations also makes the SNVCHAP unsound. Therefore the SNVCHAP should not be adopted.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.