South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Search representations
Results for CPRE Norfolk search
New searchObject
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
A.1.
Representation ID: 2322
Received: 14/02/2023
Respondent: CPRE Norfolk
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
The SNVCHAP should not be running on a different timetable to the GNLP. The housing numbers are unnecessarily high and unsound, in part due to housing within the SNVCHAP being located in more unsustainable locations which will affect the ability of the GNLP authorities to meet Climate Change targets.
To address these issues and to make the two plans sound they should run to the same timetable. As outlined above the inclusion of unnecessary housing numbers within the SNVCHAP in unsustainable locations also makes the SNVCHAP unsound and therefore it should not be adopted.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
A.8.
Representation ID: 2323
Received: 14/02/2023
Respondent: CPRE Norfolk
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
The SNVCHAP should not be running on a different timetable to the GNLP. The housing numbers are unnecessarily high and unsound, in part due to housing within the SNVCHAP being located in more unsustainable locations which will affect the ability of the GNLP authorities to meet Climate Change targets.
To address these issues and to make the two plans sound they should run to the same timetable. As outlined above the inclusion of unnecessary housing numbers within the SNVCHAP in unsustainable locations also makes the SNVCHAP unsound and should therefore not be adopted.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
A.17. The Regulation 19
Representation ID: 2324
Received: 14/02/2023
Respondent: CPRE Norfolk
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
The SNVCHAP should not be running on a different timetable to the GNLP. The housing numbers are unnecessarily high and unsound, in part due to housing within the SNVCHAP being located in more unsustainable locations which will affect the ability of the GNLP authorities to meet Climate Change targets.
To address these issues and to make the two plans sound they should run to the same timetable. As outlined above the inclusion of unnecessary housing numbers within the SNVCHAP in unsustainable locations also makes the SNVCHAP unsound. Therefore the SNVCHAP should not be adopted.
