South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Search representations

Results for Thurlton Parish Council search

New search New search

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

40.2

Representation ID: 2750

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Thurlton Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council wish to record that, as a village, we are not against development, but stress that it should be in agreement with both the needs of the village and the South Norfolk Council. During the last round of housing allocations, we were “allocated 12” and actually received 30 as a result of the Blacksmiths Gardens development. This represented roughly a 10% increase in the number of properties in the village – rising to 342 as a result. We therefore would argue that, at present, the village does not require further housing.

Change suggested by respondent:

The Parish Council wish to record that, as a village, we are not against development, but stress that it should be in agreement with both the needs of the village and the South Norfolk Council. During the last round of housing allocations, we were “allocated 12” and actually received 30 as a result of the Blacksmiths Gardens development. This represented roughly a 10% increase in the number of properties in the village – rising to 342 as a result. We therefore would argue that, at present, the village does not require further housing.
We would also highlight that both of the proposed site allocations will use the primary route into the village (Beccles Road C516) which will further increase traffic around the notorious problem corner at Hall Farm. This is a blind corner and subject to regular flooding. Highways have repeatedly tried to resolve but every fix is temporary. The Parish Council therefore ask that any agreement for the sites to be taken into planning MUST include a guarantee to provide a long-term solution to the corner.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

40.5

Representation ID: 2751

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Thurlton Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council would also comment that the bus links to the village are poor and do not easily link the village to the local town Loddon, where the majority of the required services (Doctors, Dentists, Library, Supermarket, etc) thus requiring residents to rely on cars for access. The Bus service to both Norwich/Beccles and Loddon is provided by Our Bus. Should this company fail to operate then no bus service is available from the village.

Change suggested by respondent:

We wish that the plan reflects the very limited buys service available

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

40.7

Representation ID: 2752

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Thurlton Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The course of Thurlton FP3 must be retained in its existing location and guaranteed to be a safe / open footpath. It is in constant use by local residents for both access to the school and general walkers (including dog walkers). The Parish Council do not want to see fenced “dark alleys” created which could be a target for crime, nor do the Parish Council wish for street lighting to be installed to try and alleviate this as it would not be in keeping with the rest of the village or with Norfolk’s clear skies policy.

Change suggested by respondent:

The course of Thurlton FP3 must be retained in its existing location and guaranteed to be a safe / open footpath. It is in constant use by local residents for both access to the school and general walkers (including dog walkers).
The Parish Council do not want to see fenced “dark alleys” created which could be a target for crime, nor do the Parish Council wish for street lighting to be installed to try and alleviate this as it would not be in keeping with the rest of the village or with Norfolk’s clear skies policy.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

40.8

Representation ID: 2753

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Thurlton Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council stress that should the site be taken forward any development on this site MUST be sympathetic to the existing properties surrounding (on 3 sides) the proposed location. This should take into account the range of existing home bordering – both bungalows and houses – with regard to light pollution, overlooking and noise pollution.

Change suggested by respondent:

The Parish Council stress that should the site be taken forward any development on this site MUST be sympathetic to the existing properties surrounding (on 3 sides) the proposed location. This should take into account the range of existing home bordering – both bungalows and houses – with regard to light pollution, overlooking and noise pollution.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

40.9

Representation ID: 2754

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Thurlton Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council agree that, should the site be taken forward, all vehicular access to the new site must be via Blacksmiths Gardens.
Further, the existing access to the rear of the properties on Beccles Road MUST be retained, but must be segregated from the Blacksmith Gardens access
The Parish Council also wish to stress that should 12 houses not be feasible within the allocated site, that the footprint is not simply increased to allow it to fit.

Change suggested by respondent:

The Parish Council agree that, should the site be taken forward, all vehicular access to the new site must be via Blacksmiths Gardens.
Further, the existing access to the rear of the properties on Beccles Road MUST be retained, but must be segregated from the Blacksmith Gardens access, and must not be able to provide an alternate access to the site
During any planning phase, detailed consideration must be given to the access for construction traffic to and from the site – especially in light of the impact on FP3 (see earlier comment)
During any planning phase, detailed consideration must be given to the access for agricultural traffic to and from the adjacent fields. Although access is technically possible Blacksmith Gardens, we would ask that consideration is given to enforcing access via the fields adjacent to the area, rather than through the entire estate.
The Parish Council also wish to stress that should 12 houses not be feasible within the allocated site, that the footprint is not simply increased to allow it to fit. The village will have no chance to comment on such proposals, but have experienced exactly that with the existing Blacksmiths Gardens allocation.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

40.13

Representation ID: 2755

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Thurlton Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council also wish to stress that should 12 house not be feasible within the allocated site, that the size/area is not simply increased to allow it to fit. The village will have no chance to comment on such proposals, but have experienced exactly that with the existing Blacksmiths Gardens allocation.

Change suggested by respondent:

The Parish Council also wish to stress that should 12 house not be feasible within the allocated site, that the size/area is not simply increased to allow it to fit. The village will have no chance to comment on such proposals, but have experienced exactly that with the existing Blacksmiths Gardens allocation.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Policy VC THU1: Land north of Blacksmiths Gardens

Representation ID: 2757

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Thurlton Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

• the village does not require further housing
• Existing Highways issues with Beccles Road C516 at Hall Farm
• Thurlton FP3 remain be a safe / open footpath
• Development on this site MUST be sympathetic to the properties surrounding the site
• Vehicular access must be via Blacksmiths Gardens.
• Existing access to the properties on Beccles Road MUST be retained
• Consideration must be given to the access for construction traffic
• Consideration must be given to the access for agricultural traffic
• Should 12 house not be feasible within the allocated site the site is dropped

Change suggested by respondent:

The Parish Council wish to the following in relation to this site
• at present, the village does not require further housing
• the proposed site allocations will use the primary route into the village (Beccles Road C516) which around the notorious problem corner at Hall Farm to which a long-term solution must be provided .
• Thurlton FP3 must be retained in its existing location and guaranteed to be a safe / open footpath
• The Parish Council stress that should the site be taken forward any development on this site MUST be sympathetic to the existing properties surrounding (on 3 sides) the proposed location.
• The Parish Council agree that, should the site be taken forward, all vehicular access to the new site must be via Blacksmiths Gardens.
• Further, the existing access to the rear of the properties on Beccles Road MUST be retained, but must be segregated from the Blacksmith Gardens access, and must not be able to provide an alternate access to the site
• During any planning phase, detailed consideration must be given to the access for construction traffic to and from the site – especially in light of the impact on FP3
• During any planning phase, detailed consideration must be given to the access for agricultural traffic to and from the adjacent fields.
• The Parish Council also wish to stress that should 12 house not be feasible within the allocated site, that the size/area is not simply increased to allow it to fit.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

40.14

Representation ID: 2758

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Thurlton Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council wish to state that the proposal to squeeze 15 houses into an extremely small and problematic site is, in our opinion, flawed and should be removed from consideration.
In addition to the 2016 application, 2 further applications were submitted to extend development on the site (2018/2593 & 2018/2594), but were subsequently withdrawn. However, in both cases Highways raised significant concerns about the standard of roadway through the development and the access to Beccles Road. In light of these the Parish Council ask that all 8 of the comments/recommendations from highways are considered again.

Change suggested by respondent:

In addition to the 2016 application, 2 further applications were submitted to extend development on the site (2018/2593 & 2018/2594), but were subsequently withdrawn. However, in both cases Highways raised significant concerns about the standard of roadway through the development and the access to Beccles Road. In light of these the Parish Council ask that all 8 of the comments/recommendations from highways are considered again.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

40.19

Representation ID: 2759

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Thurlton Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council are extremely concerned with the access for the proposed site, based on the allocation. As highlighted the site slopes downwards East to South-West, meaning the access to Beccles Road will be also be sloped. For the proposed target of 15 houses (~30 cars) this is a significant risk accessing the Beccles Road. We also agree with highways that access to the site via Sandy Lane to the South should not be permitted

Change suggested by respondent:

The Parish Council are extremely concerned with the access for the proposed site, based on the allocation. As highlighted the site slopes downwards East to South-West, meaning the access to Beccles Road will be also be sloped. For the proposed target of 15 houses (~30 cars) this is a significant risk accessing the Beccles Road. We also agree with highways that access to the site via Sandy Lane to the South should not be permitted
In addition to the 2016 application, 2 further applications were submitted to extend development on the site (2018/2593 & 2018/2594), but were subsequently withdrawn. However, in both cases Highways raised significant concerns about the standard of roadway through the development and the access to Beccles Road. In light of these the Parish Council ask that all 8 of the comments/recommendations from highways are considered again.

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

40.15

Representation ID: 2760

Received: 05/03/2023

Respondent: Thurlton Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council wish to state that, should the site be taken forward, the protection of the wildlife habitats, trees and the pond are given priority. This area is a bio-diverse environment and should be maintained as such

Change suggested by respondent:

The Parish Council wish to state that, should the site be taken forward, the protection of the wildlife habitats, trees and the pond are given priority. This area is a bio-diverse environment and should be maintained as such

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.