South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Search representations
Results for N/a search
New searchObject
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
29.1
Representation ID: 3026
Received: 08/03/2023
Respondent: N/a
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Rockland St Mary is primarily a linear village, rural in character on the edge of the Broads. Both sites will "intrude onto the landscape... away from the linear pattern of development" were these not the council's own words. Both these sites will significantly change the form and character of this small Broads village
the sites that have been built recently have not intruded in the form or changed the character of the village but have provided a significant uplift in housing numbers - it should be left at that
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
29.1
Representation ID: 3032
Received: 08/03/2023
Respondent: N/a
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Whilst Rockland does have the facilities above it should be noted that the bus service is irregular, not allowing an easy commute and no service past 6 pm in the evening or at all on Sundays so difficult for recreation/ work etc. The GP surgery runs on limited hours and whilst other times are available it again necessitates the use of a car to access them. Finally the Primary School has poor direct accessibility necessitating many families to drive in poor weather - a car would be a necessity for modern families living in these developments
vast reduction in numbers of properties
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)
Policy VC ROC2: South of The Street
Representation ID: 3047
Received: 08/03/2023
Respondent: N/a
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The site is not in keeping with the linear nature of the village.
The access is unsafe and will add to the congestion around the shop, surgery etc and relies on 3rd party land for splay!
The number of vehicles linked to and servicing the new development will result in a huge increase in congestion, pollution and danger to residents - contrary to SNDC policy of reducing car use this will surely fuel it! The road is already at a dangerous capacity.
The land is good for agriculture with a great level of diversity, it should remain so
decline the proposal