Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
Search representations
Results for Historic England search
New searchComment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 7b: Do you think there are any specific requirements that should be added to the allocation policy to accommodate the extra 10 dwellings?
Representation ID: 3536
Received: 31/01/2024
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome the preparation of the HIA. The recommendations of the HIA in relation to archaeology should be included in the policy requirements.
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 8a: Do you agree with the proposed allocation of SN4020, Land west of Old Yarmouth Road, Broome forat least 12 dwellings on an area of 0.76ha? Please explain your response.
Representation ID: 3537
Received: 31/01/2024
Respondent: Historic England
No comments.
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 8b: If the site is allocated, do you think there are any specific requirements that should be set out in the allocation policy?
Representation ID: 3539
Received: 31/01/2024
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome the preparation of the HIA. The recommendations of the HIA in relation to archaeology should be included in the policy requirements.
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 9a: Do you agree with the allocation of SN0218REV, Land north of The Street, Earshamfor up to 25 dwellings on an area of 1.4ha? Please explain your response.
Representation ID: 3540
Received: 31/01/2024
Respondent: Historic England
No comments.
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 9b: If the site is allocated, do you think there are any specific requirements that should be set out in the allocation policy?
Representation ID: 3541
Received: 31/01/2024
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome the preparation of the HIA. The recommendations of the HIA in relation to archaeology should be included in the policy requirements.
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 10a: Do you agree with the proposed allocation VC GIL1 REV, South of Geldeston Road and Daisy Way, Gillingham, on 2.92ha, for approximately 40 dwellings. Please explain your response.
Representation ID: 3542
Received: 31/01/2024
Respondent: Historic England
No comments.
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 10b: Do you think there are any specific requirements that should be added to the allocation policy to accommodate the extra 5 dwellings?
Representation ID: 3543
Received: 31/01/2024
Respondent: Historic England
No comments.
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 11a: Do you agree with the proposed increase in density on allocation VC SWA2, Land on Main Road, Swardeston, to accommodate approximately 40 dwellings? Please explain your response.
Representation ID: 3544
Received: 31/01/2024
Respondent: Historic England
No comments.
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 11b: Do you think there are any specific requirements that should be added to the allocation policy to accommodate the extra 10 dwellings?
Representation ID: 3545
Received: 31/01/2024
Respondent: Historic England
We reiterate our previous comments in relation to archaeological investigation for this site.
Bullet point 3 states that the HER should be consulted to determine the need for any archaeological surveys prior to development.
In our view, some assessment is needed to inform any planning application.
We therefore advise that bullet point 3 should be amended to read, ‘Planning applications should be supported by archaeological assessment including the results of field evaluation where appropriate.’
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 12a: Do you agree with the proposed allocation VC SPO1 REV, Land west of Bunwell Road, Spooner Row, for approximately 35 dwellings on 2.34ha? Please explain your response.
Representation ID: 3546
Received: 31/01/2024
Respondent: Historic England
We re-iterate our previous response in relation to the smaller site. Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within the site, the site lies immediately to the north east of the grade II listed property, The Orchards. Therefore, any development of this site has the potential to impact upon the significance of this heritage asset. We appreciate that the property is well screened by existing landscaping.
We welcome the preparation of the HIA. We welcome paragraph 34.8 and the second bullet point of the policy in relation to strengthening boundary vegetation.
See attachment for full representation.
